English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Yes, they probably would. Al-Qaeda is not a product of G.W. Bush, is not a product of the U.S. for that matter, nor is it a product of the existence of the state of Israel. It is just a fascist bunch, that despises freedom and blames whatever problem that may exist among its own people always on others, never on themselves

2006-09-02 10:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by arnok 2 · 1 3

Oh they would have tried, but Bill Clinton was looking for the attack and would have stopped it. He prevented all attackes in 2000. He would have taken the August 6th, 2001 warning that al qaeda was going to try to fly planes into our building seriously (whereas Bush was too busy riding his bike to pay attention to it).

Believe me, Clinton had a lot of faults, but taking al qaeda lightly wasn't one of them.

2006-09-02 10:35:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

al qaeda attacked us ten times while clinton was president, and the pussy did nothing about it. thats 5 times each term, so if bubba had another term we would have been attacked on 9/11 and then four more times

2006-09-02 11:07:03 · answer #3 · answered by iberius 4 · 0 0

What occurred in Bosnia became that the Serbs, Croats and Muslims have been somewhat lots to realize settlement below Jose Cutilleiro (Portugal); one in all those confederation, while Warren Zimmerman, US embassador in Belgrade had a rapid assembly with Muslim chief Izetbegovic, and then Izetbegovic retreated from the earlier usual plan. The Bosnian Muslims have been given to rule in Bosnia by ability of NATO tension and corrupted UN, upon Croats and Serbs, which brought about the escalating bloodshed right into a bloody civil conflict with one hundred,000 deaths... by ability of how, in Bosnia the Muslim forces of Fikret Avdic have been allies to the Orthodox Serbs, mutually as the Catholic Croats have been allies of the Izetbegovic Muslims... in contrast to many think of, this became no longer a religous conflict yet a conflict wherein non secular variations had earlier created political polarizations. motives why u . s . a . did this became a political repayment with Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia; to ease the present political tensions with those international places, giving them a passage to Europe, and American protection tension presence interior the area, wherein the Serbs (the community geopolitical possibility) have been to be halted, as portion of the bigger plan of going against Russia earlier Russia recuperates from inner political problems and potential counteraiding of Serbs. the incorrect image i think of you could properly be having is that u . s . a . is centred on a non secular conflict against non - Christians. The Muslims are purely a sidefactor interior the political gameboard. sooner or later they're allies, next enemies, next allies... counting right now political constelation. the biggest (and we could say virtually purely), consistent possibility to American remote places coverage (Transformational international kinfolk) are the Russians, mutually as the middle East possibility is a nutcrack. comparable element with Kosovo now. Serb Slobodan Milosevic became "doublecrossed" the comparable way Saddam Hussein became. that's a lesson for wanting to play by ability of American regulations...

2016-11-06 07:24:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He would not have ignored the memo "Bin Laden determined to strike within US" because he was on vacation. He would not have been asleep at the wheel for 2 years before we were attacked like Bush.

Now watch this drive.

2006-09-02 10:29:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Al Qaeda attacked the USS Cole and a bunch of our embassies while Clinton was president. He responded by surrendering.
His surrender may have brought on 9/11.
Al Qaeda goes after sissies. They didn't expect Bush to fight back.
They thought he might be as weak as Clinton.
Mistake on their part.

2006-09-02 10:24:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Why would al Qaeda change their plans for Clinton? As long as they didn't care about losing 19 of their own, and trust me, they don't care anything about the lives of their operatives, they had to see it as a complete success. As for the 19, I doubt that Allah had that many virgins waiting to please them. Promises, promises!

2006-09-02 10:23:58 · answer #7 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0 1

Yes, unless they would have given him a pass for not taking Bin Laden when he was offered to Bill more than once. Maybe it was some sort of "deal" to live the U.S. alone while he was President.

2006-09-02 10:54:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They could have and there were the WTC bombings in 1993 when Clinton was in office.

2006-09-02 10:31:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We wouldn't have gotten attacked at all because in my opinion, the only reason we were attacked was because of a hatred between them and Bush's father when he was president, so, they figured they'll do it to his son.

2006-09-02 10:24:44 · answer #10 · answered by day 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers