I think men are very inefficient creatures and not built practically, other than for reproducing. Agree?

Question

Let me ask you, when you go and buy something "for time being" it's usually because it's not going to be a good investment keeping it long term/ fixing it continuously/ better choices with more options. Well men are like that in many ways, they do not break down fats as well as women thus not making them for endurance (short term use) and most male jobs can be done by females or reproduced in inanimate objects which are less likely to make mistakes. Thus bring up my second question, Why do they still make $1 to our every $0.80? (so this question is also political)

I'm not a sexist, a feminist, or hate men, just more out of curiosity. (Question/Thought came to me while reading ahead in my Biology and Sociology book)

i wasn't talking about sex, i meant endurance in general, women are even better in long marathons than men

did i not mention that i'm not asking this cause i hate men? geez the book is saying this and i email my prof, and he seems to feel the same, and i dont know how to "protect my position" without getting on his bad side, he does have control over my grade, and the exams are essay format. I feel men and women each have their purpose, other than "just to reproduce" i kinda feel like if i have a child during the first few years i should stay home so the man can help me provide. SO I DONT HATE MEN geez, i mention this in the begining? but i need points so i can hold my ground without offending him

I also add i think it works the other way around too? men can do everything women can except carrying babies.

My Prof dissagrees, but won't elaborate, tells me to finish the book.

but i guess women are more important in the making babies, since we're the containers and whatever we do the baby does, but men, are kinda there to start the process so, maybe that's what he's trying to get at

Answer 1

I always figured the extra .20 I might make was like a savings account for my ex-wives cause when it was all over they got that and then some. Truth be told though ... it was money well spent.

Answer 2

You claim women are better at endurance races, yet, I don't see them beating them on equal terms in any endurance race, ever. Iron Man, Boston Marathon, Tour de France . . . Nope, no women on the winners podium.

Do women of equal value make less than men. If so, here's a fantastic opportunity for you to make alot of money. If you hire only women, you can have a labor force that is (by your math) 20% cheaper than the nearest chauvinst competitor. You'll win every bid, make 20% more than all those other CEOs who are not smart enough to take advantage of an underpaid class. Wait .. . .I don't think I've ever heard of a CEO that isn't smart enough to take advantage and even exploit of an underused asset. Hmm . . . that can't be it. Then I guess I can't answer your second question. I don't know why, if women are equal in worth in every job market, no one has taken advantage of it.

Answer 3

You sound like a scorned female. What happened, did your boy friend dump you? At any rate you sound a little off balance. Maybe you should seek professional help. And by the way, you ARE a sexist, a feminist and you DO hate men.

Answer 4

um, women's bodies need to be more efficient than men's to support babies in the womb. try wrestling a man and see how "inefficient" those boobs you carry around on your chest become.

your question touches on points that are meaningless to compare. there is no gauge that we can measure men and women on to determine who is superior. your second question is based on numbers from a 10 year old (at least!) study, so i don't know why you don't read ahead on that one and see if it's still true or not.

i haven't seen a lot of robots at the office yet. we're still employing people and muddling through our social structures to find meaning in our lives. human beings are less numerous than microbes, less practically built than horses, and less efficient than ants. when you get out in the world, you'll see that no single quality is valuable outside of the context you value it for and the time when you need it.

Answer 5

I think this is just the way society is always going to be. While your point about men in the work place has merit, you also know that us women are much more emotional creatures and that lends a different dynamic to the job, that can lead to unproductive work site,which can lead to unequal wages. Sucks, but is factual.

Answer 6

All your facts are fictional. You are obviously creating them in anger and spite.

1) Men break down fats better than women. In fact, cellulite is far, FAR, more common in women than men. Scientific fact.

2) Men have better endurance than men. A woman has NEVER won the Boston Marathon

3) Women are whiny, gossipy, complainers in the work office.

4) You're a sexist, chauvinistic, feminist that gives us smart women a bad reputation.

Answer 7

You are undoubtedly right on all points. We're completely useless creatures that have never contributed to the arts or the sciences, let alone to the spiritual plane. We are miserable creatures compared to women (and especially you).

I hope I made you feel better? BTW, can I be of use to you for the time being?

Answer 8

Of course we're inefficient... and we're not built practically either. We are definitely inferior in many ways... I mean, look at all the wars men have caused. Yet we can run faster and jump higher than women... we can lift more weight... we can swim faster. This tells me that if men are physically superior (check the record books on track and field, etc.), I would suspect that women are intuitively superior. What's your intuition tell you now?

Answer 9

I guarantee you I can out-endure almost any woman in the sack (I have won bets against GFs on this). Then again, all I am good for is reproduction so at least I specialize well. Guess it's too bad I had a vasectomy.

Answer 10

Men could say the same about women, and that could not be for all so do not generalize.