I got Chambers, Glenn, and Fred Taylor. I have tiki barber as my number one back.
2006-09-02 09:30:26 · 8 answers · asked by shawn_schreier2001 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Its good in the sense that you got more talent than you gave up. Moulds is probably worthless. However, you really should not trade a top RB and only get Fred Taylor as a replacement. Chambers will probably be a monster but if he continues some trends of inconsitency you may end up regretting the deal.
2006-09-02 09:47:54 · answer #1 · answered by subtle_betrayal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMHO Moulds is not worth much, in fact he went undrafted in most leagues, so essentially you have traded one high-value player (Jordan) for three decent players.
Chambers is a high-value WR, Glenn is a mid-to-low-value WR, and Taylor is a low-value RB.
BTW Barber is great, congratulations on acquiring him and I hope you plan to keep him.
I can't say that I like the trade very much, though, because it's better to trade a few good-but-not-great players for one star, rather than the other way around. Especially since high-value RBs are hard to come by.
You got two WR's, not that Chambers is bad, he's quite good, but WR Chambers is less valuable than RB Jordan and the other two are low-value, you could find guys atop the waiver wire who are less productive, but the dropoff is not that much.
For example Duckett, Barlow, or M. Barber at RB or Toomer or Randle El at WR are likely to be available on waivers, and are not huge drops in value from Glenn or Taylor.
Better to trade for quality, especially at shallow positions like RB, than for quantity.
2006-09-02 09:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a good trade. However, Fred Taylor always gets hurt. You should pick up a back off the waviers like Wali Lundi, Frank Gore, Mike Bell
2006-09-02 16:17:27 · answer #3 · answered by Tucker C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You made a great trade very smart move Chambers is one of the most underrated players in the league he had a spectacular season last year with bad quarterbacks now he has culpepper expect a breakout season, also lamont jordan has no O-Line, very good trade
2006-09-02 09:38:19 · answer #4 · answered by YoungGun 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have not gotten rid of Jordan...but thats not to bad. Glenn with be a loser this year cus of T.O. hogging the ball. Taylor I would have not taken . you did good at getting Chambers tho..Jorden will have a monster year..cus the Raiders will run the ball more..cus they are shakey at QB.. Brooks sucks.. Soo Basically you got 1 player or 2 Chamber is the only one that will do any thing...
2006-09-02 09:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was a great trade for you. The only problem is that Taylor always gets hurt. Moulds and Jordan are stiffs.
2006-09-02 11:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chris Bosh is a robust skill forward interior the NBA yet he's not interior the main suitable 50 gamers of all time in NBA history this question is a shaggy dog tale .Even suitable now Tim Duncan in his final 2-3 seasons continues to be greater clever than Chris Bosh interior the PF /C place .
2016-10-01 05:33:07 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The other guy's the idiot. He traded Chris Chambers?
2006-09-02 09:35:31 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋