how can I get information on how to defend myself with no attorney at trial?

Question

I can not afford my attorney to go to trial but DO NOT want a p.d as they just SUCK!!! I need information on probable cause as well as my rights which I can excercise at trial

ie: how to find a witness and how to supoena
how to admit evidence
how to plead not guilty and have case tossed out based on probable cause

what motions are and how I can use them at my dispole
how to get evidence thrown out (videa tape from stop, etc)

or where can I find a probono GOOD attorney in Georgia?

Answer 1

There is an old saying that goes something like this. “The man who defends himself in court, defends a fool.” There are several reasons for this old saying. Not the least of which is the fact you give up several rights when you defend yourself. Not the least of which is the right to claim your attorney was incompetent.

The fact of the matter is, you stand a much better chance with a PD than you do by yourself. The laws of evidence are extensive. The procedures used in a court room are complex and often confusing. This is why attorneys have to specialize. It is that complex. If you think you have seen Matlock enough to defend yourself, you have the wrong impression of how it all works. It is not a bunch of flashy TV style arguments. It is structured and controlled by the Judge.

I’m not saying you did commit the crime for which you are accused, but let’s assume you did. Take the PD. Do not admit, even to him, that you committed the crime. You’re focus is to be on giving him every bit of information you have regarding exactly what happened. That is your best chance of reducing your punishment. Always stay calm and respectful of the court.

Good luck.

Answer 2

If you represent yourself you will get convicted.......period.

A PD is better than doing it yourself, honestly, I'm not trying to be a smartass, every time I've seen someone try to represent themselves they make it worse and end up in jail. Just from the questions you're asking I can tell you don't know what you're getting into.

There's no way anyone can give you good advice on how to do any of the things you are asking without knowing the circumstances of the case. Since you say stop, I'm guessing traffic stop, and if that's true, there is no way on God's green earth that a video tape from a cop's car camcorder would ever get tossed out as evidence, it's been upheld in every court in the country.

Answer 3

My Brother is a Probabtion officer. Says that everyone who goes with the Public Defender gets the same sentence as the ones who pay the big bucks. Why? Because most often the public defender knows the way that particular county operates and is often friends with everyone in the courts. He has seen people put their life savings down and not get one different out come than if they went with the one provided for them by the courts.

Did you know that the whole shebang will depend on the person making the pre-sentence investigation? The judge usually always goes with that person's recommendation.

Remember the old saying. The man who defends himself in a court of law has a fool for a lawyer.

Answer 4

Trying to defend youself without an attorney is like trying to win a tug-of-war against a pickjup trick. You can try, if you want, but it's unlikely to do any good.

There's a reason that attorneys go to three years of law school, then years an as associate before handling a case by themselves. It's not something that someone can tell you in three paragraphs.

Answer 5

I will say that even a poor attorney is better than none, without an attorney just start serving your time.

What is the case, what are the charges, what are the evidence and so on.

Answer 6

ask all the guys in jail who tried the same approach

use the PD at least for advice unless you know a whole bunch about law - trials are a game (not the entertainment type, but the "work by a set of rules" type) - lawyers know the rules and you're at a disadvantage without one

OTOH if this is minor (it sounds like a stoplight infraction) you might learn more by doing it yourself

Answer 7

I see not something right here that could desire to characterize a mistrial. The emails have been probable not reviewed using fact your son isn't a criminal expert and did not be responsive to the thank you to precise introduce them into data. The criminal expert in the previous representing your son is irrelevant if the representation grew to become into for some thing autonomous of this difficulty (and it sounds like it grew to become into as you communicate to previous behavioral issues). Had the criminal expert had some thing to do with this difficulty on your son it would be a controversy, yet while the earlier case grew to become into unrelated to this then no conflict of interest exists. And definite, he's in charge for 30 days observe. All she mentioned grew to become into she wanted to evict. If the hire demands 30 days observe, then he desires to grant it except she starts eviction lawsuits.

Answer 8

Try a pro se project or date a law student.

Also become familiar with typing as there is lots of typing and copying that needs to be done.

A p.d. could make a better deal than you could.

Answer 9

Find an attorney that will work pro bono

Answer 10

get legal advice. a public defender is better than no attourney at all. otherwise go to a law library - it will tak ages to sift through all the case and precedent law. time which i don't think you will have to spare.