in catholic you used a capital c,why?
in England you did not,why?
2006-09-02 12:00:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Indentured Servitude isn't used as a euphemism for downplaying the white inhabitants in enslavement because the agency had significant transformations. Black enslavement in the so-referred to as united statesa.'s replaced into more effective excruciating than white enslavement. Blacks were subjugated and conditioned by race, extortionate ranges of prejudice and racism. Majority of the indentured servants got here into their servitude voluntarily. some were immigrants and weren't criminal resources. They were pretty mistreated in conserving with type, well-being and nationwide prejudice and the white inhabitants in the so-referred to as united statesa.'s that were both rich or poverty-bothered, enslaved or emancipated, benefited as a fashion of production.
2016-12-06 03:58:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did we realize it? Yes. Do you have a more specific question regarding it? It is good for you to study such things, but you will need focus on how it came about and what happened as a result. This will give you the knowledge to prevent it in the future.
2006-09-02 07:04:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by R_SHARP 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the scots were'nt the only ones to suffer, the english catholics had to suffer as well. have you ever heard of the winchester martyrs. 278 catholic men women and children of english blood were cut down by their own steel. obviously ireland is the most well known recipient of british "justice" . but britain did abuse its own people as well. do not go down the road of " them and us" its history, leave it in the history books and move foward
2006-09-02 07:11:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought we won Culloden........there were more Scots on the winning side than the losing side.
2006-09-02 06:56:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. That's the nature of feudal systems.
And race had nothing to do with it, at the point. The oppression was based on nationality and/or religion.
2006-09-02 06:51:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.
It is never about ethnics. It is always about ethics.
Cromwell also made the bagpipes illegal during his term.
2006-09-02 07:01:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeBlanc 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought a lot of folks knew that
2006-09-02 06:52:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ditto genocide.
2006-09-02 06:53:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's history. What's your question?
2006-09-02 06:55:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋