2006-09-02 06:14:05 · 11 answers · asked by arigont 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Bristol,Va-Tn.
2006-09-02 06:31:16 · answer #1 · answered by hungerforknowledge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because cities are incorporated within a single state.
However, there are many metropolitan areas that extend seamlessly across a state border, as if the city had parts in both states. But they are actually two different cities, just adjacent.
2006-09-02 13:16:42 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Reno/Tahoe California/Nevada
2006-09-06 13:07:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Lake Tahoe (California/Nevada)
2006-09-02 13:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by SpecialKsGirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
San Francisco is in the state of California and the state of confusion.
2006-09-02 13:16:53 · answer #5 · answered by united9198 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Texarkana. Texas /Arkansas. State line runs through town.
2006-09-02 13:16:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Augusta and north Augusta in Georgia-sth Carolina
2006-09-02 13:43:38 · answer #7 · answered by Wanderer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup. St. Louis, Mo, E St. Louis, IL /KCmo, KCKS, etc. Then there is Texarkana, which is in more than two states.
2006-09-02 13:20:02 · answer #8 · answered by debop44 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kansas City,and some other have the same names but are still separate city's.each with their own city governments
2006-09-02 13:22:59 · answer #9 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kansas city is in two different sts
2006-09-02 13:16:40 · answer #10 · answered by Dan B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋