Assuming that you knew that Arnold Shwarzenegger father was an SS nazi soilder...?

Question

and that his mother when his father died married another SS nazi soilder and that Arnold himself has priased Nazism...(Don't believe me..look it up yourself)....that being said how would you feel if a bill passed allowing forigners to become presidents of the united? (now remember you have NO say in whether it does or not..its a majority house vote that decides and the represenatives you think are there to represent you are really just there to accept expensive contributions to their campaigns..but i'd like to know how the public at large feels)

Answer 1

You facts are very distorted. I have an idea...why don't you really research this area before assuming something you heard or read somewhere is factual?

Answer 2

Everyone knows that Arnold Schwarzenegger father was a member of the Nazi party. So was half of Austria at the time. But Arnold father was a member not an active member. There is a huge different between been a member of a party and been an active member. You must remember what period this was during the second world war. He is now American citizen. So why shouldn't he run for office? finish it off pity about your spelling sadly simple words like soilder lol soldier ok

Answer 3

Actually, it would require a Constitutional amendment, not a law.

And just because one person may or may not be well suited or popular doesn't have anything to do with the idea in general.

Take a person who was born overseas. His parents died when he was just days old, and he is raised his entire life in the US, by his aunt and her husband who had both been loyal US citizens since their birth. He becomes a US citizen, grows up in the US his entire life, serves in the US military, etc. The only thing that separates him from a natural born citizen is the first few days of his life.

Why should that person be automatically and permanently barred from being president, just because of where he was geographically when born?

One example (Arnie) does not cover the range of issues involved with changing that birth requirement in Article II.

Answer 4

There will never be a foreign born President... ever. Thinking it may happen wastes your time. It'll require a constitutional amendment, not a simple passing of a law. The chances are zero of it happening.

Answer 5

relies upon on no rely in case you suspect a individual's extra marital activities impact their suitability for workplace. i think of it became into already rather lots public know-how - the mummy hasn't precisely saved the secret ok - previously this judgement besides and it would have been basic daft to maintain on pretending that it became right into a great secret while she's gossiping to magazines and making use of the youngster as leverage. the authentic query is, how many extra childrens has he fathered that we don't understand approximately. yet.

Answer 6

Prescot Bush helped the Nazis during WWII.

Answer 7

No you should have to be born here to become president. ( Arnie or anyone else.) They should not pass a law changing that.

Answer 8

I assume that you don't mind that Clinton shoved a cigar up Monica's thrill box and consider him to be a great president.

Answer 9

NO. Only naturally born American citizens should be allowed. There is two much opportunity for dual loyalties.

Answer 10

I personally would not have much problem with it, because we have a system of checks and balances in this country that stops any one branch of government from taking over everything entirely.