Driver and 2 passengers are underage the 3rd passenger is 21, crashes kills himself and another minor?

Question

Driver throws a party and then decides that more alcohol is needed. He leaves with two other minors and a 21 year old friend. The driver is 18, the other passengers are 16, 17 and 21. On the return trip the driver crashes the car and kills himself the 16 year old and injures the other two passengers. I don't believe the 21 year old supplied the original alcohol, but may have bought additional that was in the trunk of the car at the time of the accident. What are the ramifications of the 21 year old now that two minors have been killed????

Answer 1

If the driver had alcohol in his system and they can prove the 21 year old bought alcohol (witnesses, video surveillance, receipts.etc) they may have a case. But if the driver threw the party, where was it? Parents house? They could find a way to hold parents responsible.
If you are of age, throw a party, serve alcohol and someone gets killed after they leave your party, YOU can be held responsible. If a bartender serves someone alcohol and they get killed after leaving bar or restaurant, the bartender and the establishment can be held responsible. It's happened a couple of times in my state.

Answer 2

I dont know for sure, but I would say the 21 year old will be held responsible and the person that was throwing the party. If someone leaves your house and you provided the alcohol, then the person giving the party is responsible for those people. Also if the 21 yr old bought the liquer at the store, Im guessing they could be charged with providing alcohol to underage minors.

Answer 3

Any traffic accident, the person who incharge (example: the driver) will be held responsible. He have to ensure his own safety and third parties (such as other road users, pedestian, passengers and etc). Who supplied the alcohol is not the issue.

Answer 4

Solid evidence has to be provided that the 21 year old is the one who bought the alcohol. Also, the person who has title to the car might be responsible, unless he is dead. And believe it or not, the person who threw the party possibly can be sued under their homeowner's insurance.

Answer 5

<> in simple terms through fact some thing it criminal does not mean it fairly is precise. <> there's a reason you won't be able to spell 'assume' without '***'. people who assume too plenty finally end up making asses of themselves. <> does not make experience, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings only assume the government is physically powerful! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults harm your credibility. perhaps Marc, like me, does not see too plenty interior the way of credibility whilst examining your question. <> The term "fetus" actually potential "the extra youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a residing person. existence starts off at concept, not start nor some arbitrary element in between. hence, each and every abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn person. <> however the fetus IS human. hence, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so narrow minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing human beings they are? through fact you at the instant cannot try this, does not that recommend your recommendations is that if reality be told extra narrow than mine? <> That in simple terms is going to tutor how schizophrenic human institutions might nicely be - and you prefer to think of such a company (the government) is physically powerful.

Answer 6

It is my (unqualified) belief that the 21 year old is SKROOD, big time.

Answer 7

Wow, good question! I don't know the answer, but I will check back to see if anyone else does!

Answer 8

http://magegame.ru/?rf=c1e0ebe0eaeee2f1eae8e9

Answer 9

It's quite possible that he will be held liable.