God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve
D^kz are for chiks
2006-09-02 02:27:16 · 17 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes, there are already lobby groups for such. 20 years ago people laughed when I warned about things we are seeing today. And they laught when I tell them where this is leading.
2006-09-02 02:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
The sexual orientation of adults (adults, not children) should not be a concern of the state. If adult homosexuals of either sex were accepted by the mainstream, there is no relationship between that and molestation. Molestation, whether by homosexuals or heterosexuals, is a crime. The two things, homosexuality and molestation, are two different things. Some homosexuals may be molesters, but some may not; and some child molesters may be homosexual, but some are heterosexual. You need to keep the two things--one legal, one illegal-- separate...God sure did make Adam and Steve (if as you say god ceated everyone)...Marriage is an unnatural relationship.
2006-09-02 02:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by Pandak 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what has being homosexual got to do with child molesters and animals ? Gay people love their own kind , men to men or women to women.
A child molester is just as likely to be heterosexual as you read in the newspapers on a near daily basis
All child molesters either straight or gay should be castrated and should never be allowed into the mainstream.
Dont get the animal part of your question though
2006-09-02 02:39:50 · answer #3 · answered by dukedog 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
homosexuals are already main stream in the catholic church (sometimes i think even Popes are homo's) & episcopalian. hope it stops there,but california has been homosexual friendly sicne the 1960's. US Government has a few homosexuals leading the country. would'nt that be considered mainstream..sad to say...i am not a homo nor a homo promo and even your question gives me the jitters. i do belive homo should live free lifes but short of formal legallization. by the way i also belive homo's should be able to adopt abandoned or abused children. do we have a chocie? and no child & animal molesters will never gain acceptance !
2006-09-02 02:44:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
While I am not homophobic, I don't agree with their lifestyle. I DO feel that they should be allowed certain civic rights.
Being homosexual may become accepted, but if you think about it, most child molesters are already accepted in society as the "nice" teacher, or scout leader, or religious leader, or family friend.....
There is a HUGE difference between being homosexual and being a child molester.
2006-09-02 02:36:11 · answer #5 · answered by tweetymay 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have known a lot of decent gays over the years, but the libs homo promo game has become pretty tiresome.
People like talking about slippery slopes these days and I suppose there's some merit to it. If two people incapable of procreation can be married then why shouldn't polygamy be legal? Isn't one of the prime reasons for legal marriage supposed to be to encourage a stable environment for the raising of children? One man and one woman raising one or more children for procreation of the species. So what's wrong with one man and 4 women raising one or more children for procreation of the species? It seems to me that polygamy makes a lot more sense than gay marriage. Just strictly enforce the statutory rape thing, marrying 13 year olds like that Jeffs guy is pretty perverted.
I'm against gay marriage, but I am for legal civil unions for gays. If they want to be life partners and have legal rights for important decisions and inheritance and such I don't see anything wrong with that, just don't call it marriage. I'm also against polygamy, but not because of the multiple wives thing. I think pre-arranged marriages violate rights, I think the prophet deal is a big scam and I think too many of them are sickos who want to dork pubescent girls.
2006-09-02 02:41:27 · answer #6 · answered by OzobTheMerciless 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The far left wants "us" (the world) to be a "free" society. That is NO morals at all Ruth Ginsberg (Supreme Court Justice) wants to legalize prostitutiion and make the age of concent 12. Some want poligamy. I think Ted Kennedy wants to legalize beastiality, as that is probably the only sex he can get any more. It is NOT a social issue. Read 1 John 4:1-6.
2006-09-02 02:37:52 · answer #7 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I know this guy named billy, he married a sheep in a civil ceremony.
He disguised the sheep in a wedding dress, and put lipstick and ear rings on it.
When he was caught attempting to consumate the marriage he was arrested.
They brought the sheep into the courtroom as evidence.
The best evidence that convicted him was when the sheep started backing up to the witness stand while he was in it. the D.A. was holding the rope around the sheeps neck.
as they led him away to prison he was heard singing th old song, "There will never be another ewe".
2006-09-02 02:39:37 · answer #8 · answered by theodore r 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You idiot!
The horrible thing is that people like you are accepted into mainstream society without question. Where do you come up with this stuff?
2006-09-02 02:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by punkvixen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Give them an inch , they'll demand a mile
They can do what they want in privacy , they don't need to DRAG it out onto the street .
2006-09-02 02:36:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋