2006-09-02 00:43:00 · 5 answers · asked by Sam 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
i dont think that we need un
2006-09-02 00:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by sunny 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We need the un
and most of the war takin after 1945
had the hand of the 5 permanent members
we need to move these five contries
us/uk/russia/china/france.
none of these contries are least as responsible
as iran or N.korea
to the general category.
2006-09-02 10:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by pagolpakhi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after the end of second world war,1945 BC after that UN established several war eccured . we need UN because it is a universal collection that we can declare our thought for the people of the world even it has no influence
2006-09-02 07:51:10 · answer #3 · answered by eshaghi_2006 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think president Woodrow Wilson originally wanted 'League of Nation' in attempt to prevent future global conflicts. I don't think it was very successful, but later led to formation of UN.
US was involved in various type of millitary actions very frequently. UNs still valuable tool for fighting global conflicts even though many countries defy its rules including us. Voice of several countries is still going to have more leverage than voice of just one.
2006-09-04 04:04:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean the United Nothing?
'Nuff said?
2006-09-02 07:48:15 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Peachy® 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋