With newer gadgets and biometric devices,is there a new trend catching up for meeting unknown threats to new companies?Is there a foolproof method of efficiently working for security in a corporation with minimum time loss?
2006-09-01 21:42:54 · 11 answers · asked by dream_to_death 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
there is...it's called podnets....completely secure cached networking for internal networks...no "live unapproved" internet activity...
pretty wild actually...
2006-09-05 12:37:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
boy it sounds like a lot of boys with fancy toys..
they have to say there is a problem so they can have more and better toys..
i think the money could be better spent on teaching peace and understanding each other.. verce war toys..
secirity is an issue on a whole in any major u.s. city... just look at how many people are murdered by few americans....more then the irans are killing.... we need to fix the problems in our own country violence first , before we put our nose into any counties business.
2006-09-02 13:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by alaska 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should always prepare yourself as if there is going to be a threat, that way you can't get caught by surprise. I believe that's the best way with anything whatever it may be to ensure security as best as one can.
2006-09-04 15:44:28 · answer #3 · answered by VelvetRose 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
security is not a problem if the world is at peace.
it is a problem when some crazy idiots start tryintg to challenge the tightness of the security system to proof that the system is not that disaster-proof.
2006-09-02 05:41:29 · answer #4 · answered by movies watcher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Security is not a problem its a challange for the thirid world.,where security men have created security problems,killing various leaders.
2006-09-02 05:12:50 · answer #5 · answered by eitemad_eitemad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing is fool proof
anything can be hacked or cracked
its just a matter of how much time and effort it takes
2006-09-02 05:02:09 · answer #6 · answered by hacker_ty_24 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
just a safety problem
2006-09-05 22:15:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2006-09-05 21:23:54 · answer #8 · answered by autumnsmommy21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.not really its just for safety.
2006-09-02 04:45:22 · answer #9 · answered by nikki c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-09-02 04:48:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋