2006-09-01 21:10:30 · 21 answers · asked by mateenshahnam 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I think they both suck.
2006-09-01 21:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mel Gibson
2006-09-01 21:16:11 · answer #2 · answered by Meow 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mel Gibson
2006-09-01 21:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mel Gibson
2006-09-01 21:13:24 · answer #4 · answered by Meeya 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mel Gibson; he is a more versatile actor. He can successfully play in comedic, action, and dramatic roles. Kevin Costner made a huge disaster called "Water World" when he tried to move out of that leading man arena he has found success in.
2006-09-01 21:14:57 · answer #5 · answered by Kami 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mel gibson
2006-09-01 21:48:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kevin Costner is better Field of Dreams is a classic and I loved Waterworld. The only movie of Mel's I've liked was Pocahontas and that was animated it was only his voice.
2006-09-01 21:35:47 · answer #7 · answered by sg1alias 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well kevin costner is a n academy awrd nominated actor but mel gibson has won an oscar for passion of the christ.
2006-09-01 22:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
mel gibson but if you say what is the better sure u love the both so dont choose
2006-09-01 23:27:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
MEL GIBSON, hands down, kevin will get better as he ages
2006-09-01 21:28:46 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kevin Costner was great in "The Big Chill". He played the dead guy.
2006-09-01 22:05:48 · answer #11 · answered by Ironball 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋