2006-09-01 20:59:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I support it.
There are so many drugs out there that are legal and a lot more harmful side affects than Marijuana. I cannot see why anyone would be against something that can help people.
2006-09-01 21:05:03 · answer #1 · answered by Dolby21 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Medicine uses many poisons and forbidden substances in order to make medications. So, I don't see why marijuana is different. But just doctors should use them.
2006-09-02 04:07:20 · answer #2 · answered by cpinatsi 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I watched my mother die of cancer. She had no appetite from all the chemo and radiation treatments. She probably would have died from starvation before the cancer got her if she wouldn't of had medical marijuana. She smoked, she ate. It is that simple. Good question. Also rense what's up with the IMPEACH????????? curiosity
2006-09-02 04:08:07 · answer #3 · answered by frogspeaceflower 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One hundred percent support all the way, but hell I support personal use too. Of all of the ways available to us to self-medicate, pot just isn't one of the big bad guys.
2006-09-02 04:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by sueflower 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!
2006-09-02 05:15:52 · answer #5 · answered by tamwagon 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no reliable evidence that marijuana has any medicinal purposes whatsoever.
2006-09-02 08:37:45 · answer #6 · answered by Carl 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i most certainly do. marijuana is not the majority of the drug problem. its cocaine that gets people addicted.
2006-09-02 04:06:29 · answer #7 · answered by Sarah F 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-02 04:05:30 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I M P E A C H
2006-09-02 04:02:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
who wants to smoke at hospital or dr's office, should only do crack there.
2006-09-02 04:05:52 · answer #10 · answered by terry 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋