English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it at all interesting that the ones that encourage kids to kill themselves for the ultimate reward and 72 virgins, never seem interested to get there themselves?

2006-09-01 20:08:51 · 12 answers · asked by OatesATM 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

Its A cause,it's even his cause.but lets not get stupid.72 virgins, his got ,9 lives he ain't.Besides who would be there to tell all those kids what to do. He is rather commanding A bunch of idiots.Lets look at this practically.Would you really stake your life on the hope that there is A shangrila.Those boys need to wake up and smell the Folgers,A bird in the hand is worth 72 in the bush.As A foot note ,they never did stipulate ......virgin what?

2006-09-01 20:24:44 · answer #1 · answered by foreversmilingirish 2 · 0 0

Why die for a cause when you can get other peope to die for the cause. Besides, with enough political power, you could get all the virgins you want on earth.

2006-09-01 20:11:53 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 0

Every Muslim is ready to die for Islam - the youngest religion .......... Its true and this the world has seen .............. Muslims have not got the justics from the so called peace keeping organization in the world..........especialy the UN....UN is acting as per the US saying ..........UN does not have its own power...........US and Isreal are running the UN..........therefore there is unrest in the world................

2006-09-01 20:21:09 · answer #3 · answered by mmosafir 2 · 0 0

If he at all exists ! ?

Any political leader, sends pawns to be martyred, Hitler, Napoleon, GW Bush etc.

In an ideal world, if these so called political leaders, die for the cause first, we wouldn't have so much war ( or mongering) , would we ? !

2006-09-02 02:46:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because that low life thinks he has a higher calling.

2006-09-01 20:14:49 · answer #5 · answered by h2odog 3 · 1 0

He's a coward and it would not be good for the morale of the terrorists if he dies of a suicide.

2006-09-01 21:47:37 · answer #6 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0 0

Right. And why hasn't George W. Bush?

2006-09-01 20:16:51 · answer #7 · answered by Rvn 5 · 0 1

Because he is "Bush's",, "PULL,,, IN CASE OF FIRE" Ever wonder why he suddenly appears when crap starts getting deep. Like white house trouble?

2006-09-01 20:13:50 · answer #8 · answered by Kittykat 2 · 0 1

That question put in my mind a lot of questions for our President too...

2006-09-01 20:15:15 · answer #9 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0 1

Because they know it's a line of BULL!

2006-09-01 20:17:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers