Well they're all connected. But my personal favourite is the sixth one. It just broke my heart.
2006-09-02 03:26:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When i started reading the first book when i was nine i consideres it quite boring and stopped reading after the first chapter. and then my friends all started discussing about harry and i was compelled to start the first book again but still i found it boring. and then i started with the second book and then it b'came interesting and then i read the first book which turned out to be good. when i read the third book i thought it was the best of the three.
then with the goblet of fire i realised it was better than the third.the fifth book was very nice too excluding the reintroduction of characters including harry. got bored of that. but when i read the sixth book that became my favorite.
i reckon that when i read the seventh book i will find that the best. it just shows that jk gets better with each book.
this is my list of my order of liking the books startting from the best to the not so good
7th book
half-blood prince
goblett of fire
prisoner of azkaban
order of the phoenix
chamber of secrets
philosopher's stone
2006-09-02 05:10:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by teenwitch 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm betting it will be Number Seven!!!
I can't really choose a best, except that perhaps the first one was the most effective, in that it introduced us to a whole new way to write fiction. But then, she managed to be startlingly imaginative in every book. Azkaban was priceless, particularly in its shift in point of view regarding Sirius Black. But each book has managed to reach beyond the previous. I really can't wait for Number Seven! Rowling has set herself a daunting task to be able to surprise, really surprise, her loyal fans at this stage.
Ms. Rowling has mixed so many truths in with her fiction in ways that go back to the great classics of satire and social commentary, but without the irony of being only good for adults while pretending to be for children. Not such Lewis Carroll has such a successful breaching of the age categorization of fiction been made. And I think history will prove she has been at least as influential as Lewis Carroll.
I have great, great hope for Book Seven, and I have a nearly overwhelming impatience to get on with reading it. This time I'm going to go to the midnight party at Borders in full regalia and have a blast! The last book party!!!
2006-09-02 03:04:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by auntb93again 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Order of the Phoenix as it is the most in depth of many characters at once. Harry comes to terms with loss.
2006-09-02 02:57:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by sescja 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think the last one because too many tragic things happened, the story evolved a lot, harry is old enough to face difficult situations, it is full of action and not daily school stuff like some of the previous books...
2006-09-02 11:04:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As of now, the sixth. The action is there! Dumbledore dead, Snape escaped, and lots more! And J.K. Rowling introduced a mysterious character at the end of the book...
2006-09-02 03:12:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by mackie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thus far, I think my favorite is the sixth. It flowed better than any of the others, had a better "mystery" sort of aspect (a good honest mystery, with a just a bit of information tossed out here and there, just enough to tantalize) and a far more complete, connected plot than any of the others.
2006-09-02 03:10:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by angk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The third, because it's a bit "darker" than the first and the second but not so complicated as the others.
2006-09-02 03:32:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The third beause its darker and because of harry's relationship with sirrius black.
2006-09-02 04:10:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the first one,,because it didnt get to alot of boring details yet.... and you dont have to read something before it to understand the book..i mean it is the FIRST BOOK..
2006-09-02 02:57:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by lauren 4
·
0⤊
0⤋