What is the hard evidence to prove Loose Change is a hoax?

Question

I just saw Loose Change for the first time last night. It really freaked me out and I have been researching its accuracy ever since I watched it. I want more than anything for someone to prove to me that it is a hoax. Please use examples that can be proven. So far all of the opposition is merely laughing and name calling. That does not mean they have a case. Please, someone prove to me this film is bogus. Thank you.

still, nothing specific. A lot of professors??? What is that supposed to mean. Who are they? Where can I find them? And, for the guy who doesn't care, what's that about?

Answer 1

What is the hard evidence that this has anything to do with politics?

Hehe, I thought you were talking about something totally different. my bad.

Answer 2

Well there is a vast amount of evidence it isn't a hoax. But I will give you some illogical reasoning behind "Loose Change". For one thing they say, that jet fuel cannot burn hot enough to melt the steel in the towers. IT DOESN"T HAVE TO HOT ENOUGH TO MELT IT. Just weaken it enough that it can't support the 300 million tons of building it is supporting.
Why would Osama Bin Laden, take credit and praise the hijackers, and find evidence in Germany of the plans if the government did it? Why wouldn't the Taliban turn over Bin Laden if they thought he was innocent, and avoid being routed and overthrown?
Why were there no bystanders that saw the "missile" that hit the Pentagon?
Why were there cell phone calls from the passengers of Flight 93 to their loved ones describing what was going on, on that flight? Remember "Let's Roll"?
And lastly, why would the conspirators choose the twin towers in the biggest city in the US to do this? Couldn't they have chosen a different site, that might have caused the same effect? Like the Capitol, alone? Or a stadium full of people? I think the outcry would have been just as loud. And if they did the Capitol, the president would have no opposition to what he had wanted to do--if it was a conspiracy.
They say some of the "hijackers" are still alive. Couldn't they come forward and prove this was a hoax? How would that look.? Hey, look it's Mohammad Atta, didn't you fly.....into...the building....thing?

Answer 3

It’s sparkling worldwide warming/climate substitute is real. It’s the two sparkling the > present day < warming cycle has been happening using fact the final ice age and that’s why the Sahara grew to become into grassland 10,000 years in the past yet is desolate tract at present + has been desolate tract for hundreds of years. the reality the present warming type began long in the previous there grew to become into any marketplace and while there have been infrequently any human beings is powerful data people at the instant are not the reason. It additionally skill people at the instant are not the answer. The Earth is going by way of consistent climate substitute cycles and has finished so during its history. the right mechanism isn't thoroughly understood yet seems to be on the subject remember of photograph voltaic interest and the axial tilt of the Earth because it orbits the solar - not human interest. notice that the Earth is doubtless on the tip of the present warming cycle and could start up cooling quickly (“quickly” in geological words). all the carbon tax/carbon offset BS is only theft or extortion disguised as technology. international locations like China and India enjoyed the belief of carbon taxes/carbon offsets – yet purely while they could pretend to be “undeveloped”. as quickly because it grew to become into stated the two are undesirable polluters of > each and every sort < they by surprise weren’t so prepared on the belief. purely the international Left and international locations like North Korea & Zimbabwe nonetheless love the belief of carbon taxes. The Left loves the belief using fact they're committed to destroying the West customarily and the USA of a in specific. Getting the stepped forward worldwide to wreck its own business base is a few thing they desire. Having the West concurrently supply loose guilt-money to international locations like North Korea & Zimbabwe might only make it greater clever. regrettably, scientific study has been compromised via the politics of the project. the academic community leans some distance to the Left, so researchers who “teach” human-led to worldwide warming (AGW) are rewarded with greater materials, yet researchers who don’t “teach” AGW locate themselves decrease off. The politics of the project are a project using fact we actually do could desire to be responsive to the way the Earth works so we are able to anticipate, anticipate, and regulate. We additionally could desire to decrease rather pollutants it is poisoning our ecosystem, and international locations like China & India shouldn’t get a loose experience.

Answer 4

please ,PLEASE if you get anyone to provide that proof to you please ,Please forward it to me cause I just saw it myself and if it is accurate then the world needs to see for them self and all those victims families go t grounds for filling criminal charges against all those involved
further more I think what should happen is that every american has a duty to question this administration on this and demand that all acounts be publically shown every frame of avery video should be public property due to the nature of the incodent it should not be a matter of national security after the fact cause we all sat thee and watched it live as it happened and hearing what the offical story was while it was happening and we are entitled to look at it after the fact for an unedited perseption of what accually happened and if those buildings were destroyed as loose change so well describes then is it a failsafe in the buildings constuction so that it could not fall down uncontrolably
another thing is that event has spawned a new world veiw of policy in our government and has cost billions of dollars in its wake and thousands of lifes after its initial impact who would be responsable what would be the outcome of such an act and what motive would be usedd to get a conviction .
I hate to think of the civil rivolte that would ensue accual evidence of the governments involvement in 9/11 it would be open season on republicans and no politician would be safe i think and that is why you will never see any video to support loose change and why it will not even be looked at by any grand jury if I had the money I would and the supportg of 10,000 people who would stage a sit in protest in washingtonn I would rent a movie screen for outdoors and play that video were i knew all the politicians could see it and ask them to answer questions in an open forum as why we are not investigating the possability other than the magic bullet therory ?
ok i just reviewed part of the debunking loose change vieo and it is worse than i thought they cant disprove it they just keep reafirming that a flight 77 did not crash into the pentigon and if they cant prove that it did how can they prove loose change is a fraud i got to tell ya i want answers just like you and im sure we cant be alone

Answer 5

There is no hard evidence that the film is a hoax.
However, there is hard evidence that the THREE WTC buildings were demolished by controlled explosion, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was an inside job.
I know its difficult to believe, but this could be the first step in your opening awareness.
as awareness opens the bigger and bigger patterns emerge, and it becomes much easier to understand things like this, and why they happen.
You are doing the right thing. Keep researching, until you are sure of your own truth. The one thing you can be absolutely certain of is that the 9/11 Commission report is a whitewash.
Take a look at the site below, and that will link you to 500 other sites which are all informing you of the government lies.

Answer 6

Given that it is "documentary" it is amazing at the number of factual errors (lies) as well as the conjecture that is postured as fact. It was so loaded with both factual errors and conjecture that they had to release a 2nd edition that essentially admitted the factual inaccuracies but said that these items were not pertinent to their conclusion yet still wants to be taken seriously as a documentary, my friend that is a crock. If the fact that Islamist extremist murdering cowards went on Aljazer TV and many other media outlets outside of the US (excuse me if I misspelled the name of the terrorist network but frankly I could care less) and said they did it does not convince you then there is a good chance nothing will.

Answer 7

i never heard it was a hoax and to be honest i dont know how it cold be it makes too much sense.
if just htink it is a too freaky so it is being swept under the carpet

Answer 8

Many professors dispute the plausibility, the majority reject the idea that it is impossible to destroy a building with a jet liner, and believe that it is possible the buildings were destroyed by the jets.

Answer 9

Not sure but I'm gonna check back to see what answers you get, good question my dear....

Answer 10

Coragryh has a point, insofar as taking a logical position; but, damn, I still don't buy it. It's too monstrous to conceive.