blood have cell, not just chemical. Cannot make cell with chemical.
2006-09-01 16:02:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by martin h 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Say what, eh?......Perhaps you are looking for an answer to be *stem cells*. Well, should it be that easy then Blood drives would not be necessary. Well, the American Red Cross and its associates, Star of David, Crescent and the new International symbol for collection of blood [ _ ] (Best effort using the keyboard of the new symbol) members have tried to create blood from chemicals. Their success has been less than keeping 'real' blood from spoiling.
why cannot make brain with in chemical --eh?
2006-09-01 16:29:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by fran t 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have made synthetic blood. There was quite a scandal last year because major hospitals were testing the blood on patients without their consent or knowledge, and this was approved by our government. Because many of the patients the blood was tested on were in critical condition, it is difficult to attribute their deaths to the synthetic product, but many who were treated did recover.
2006-09-01 16:14:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cynanon 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
HUH! Lay off the chemicals! We can't understand your question!
2006-09-01 16:14:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by rltouhe 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the good Lord made it that way. Blood is a valuable thing.
2006-09-01 16:02:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by lanneypoo4u 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
some clarity might benefit you here. take another crack at it.
i hope you get the answers you seek.
2006-09-01 16:02:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by zedling 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
huh?
2006-09-01 16:00:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Campbell Gramma 5
·
1⤊
0⤋