English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All 200,000 tons of steel which required a CONSTANT temperature of over 3000 centigrade and all 11 black boxes melted. These can't be melted with 1000 degree temperature whcih is the maximum in a fire. To many of us there is no doubt that dynamites were carefully planted before hand and Bush's junior brother was the incharge of the security of the WTC. There were blasts at WTC before air crash and the cameras were eagerly wating to catch the pictures of air crash and ex israeli Prime Minister was redy in BBC studio to attack Muslims and he started this within 3 minutes of the blast. BBC even dug out an old football victory in Arab World to show it as a reaction to 9/11

2006-09-01 14:42:32 · 12 answers · asked by pathowiz 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

12 answers

Crazy ranting.

2006-09-01 14:49:13 · answer #1 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 4 0

The strength of steel changes with the temperature. If the steel was in a one story structure, chances are the steel would have been left standing when all else turns to ash. The weight of the stories above the steel were to heavy for the steel at the elevated temperatures. The floors involved in the fire lost it's tensile strength in the fire. F=ma. The acceleration of the weight of the floors above the impact zone allowed for the weight of the towers above it to accelerate downward by gravity. The design of the lower floors was not strong enough to resist the momentum of the force crushing each floor as it collapsed underneath the weight.

2006-09-01 15:04:06 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Cellophane 6 · 2 0

Intense heat weakened the steel. It didn't melt. The weight of the floors above it caused it to snap.

The idea that explosives were planted before the planes hit is one of the most idiotic ideas I've heard in a long time. Dream on.

2006-09-01 14:51:18 · answer #3 · answered by Ranto 7 · 2 0

people who make excuses on your logic are the real nuts. It purely proves how lots they're paid to be biased at any value. If hearth grew to become into warm adequate to weaken thieve, this is hardship-loose sense that all and sundry people on the 78th floor might have already been lifeless to a crisp. instead of specializing in any of the twin towers, your concentration could be on construction 7 of the worldwide commerce middle. it is the third construction throughout the time of 9/11 that collapsed to boot with some substantial clues: a) not one of the airplanes hit the construction and spilled gasoline. b) proprietor of the construction ordered the demolition and fall down during the form. c) construction grew to become into pre-rigged with fantastically stepped forward demolition shape rates (thermite) and distant administration detonation. Unbelievers could be full of nonsense yet none of them can dispute how WTC construction 7 imploded exceedingly while the demolition grew to become into ordered ensue at that 2d via the owner.

2016-10-01 04:53:11 · answer #4 · answered by marrone 4 · 0 0

you are crazy as hell........Go do some more drugs or what every you are on ,set down and think about what you have asked and if you think long enough the answer will come to your thick head.The reason it came had to do with the damage the jets did on in pack the amount of fuel the jets had on board the buildings were not design to be put threw the stress don't you read or watch the history channel,maybe not need to.

2006-09-01 15:01:12 · answer #5 · answered by Douglas R 4 · 1 0

The insulation in the building was ripped to shreds when the plane hit allowing the heat to weaken the steel structure.

2006-09-01 14:49:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Those buildings were hit by planes with a full tank of jet fuel. It wasn't like it was struck by a VW Beetle.

2006-09-01 14:50:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I have seen this on SA news. The blast took place before the aircraft hit the building. The whole building was rigged.

2006-09-01 16:26:51 · answer #8 · answered by mumtaz 6 · 1 3

Some people think it was a controlled demolition. Watch this video, they bring up some very interesting points...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

2006-09-01 14:49:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Just say NO to unfounded conspiracy theories!

2006-09-02 15:11:44 · answer #10 · answered by Bad M 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers