Why should a father be charged for murdering a man who was raping his 2 year old daughter?

Question

That is not fair he should get a medal

Answer 1

In all regards he also broke the law while protecting his daughter he should be given a medal , I would do whatever I had to do to protect my children just like him

Answer 2

You are assuming that you know for a fact that another man was raping his 2 year old child. First of all does a 2 year old child have the capcity to tell an adult that they have been "raped"? The answer is NO. A 2 year old doesn't even know what the term means, therefore we must conclude that the situation was brought to fruition by an adult. Correct? Think in the sense of a child that has never experienced a trama defining what the trama actually was when it occured. There can become inferences upon the adult to assume what the child could be saying. Even the smartest of children can be obscure...just this evening at work I asked a 3 year old how she liked her maccaroni and her response to me was,"Austrailia". Can I have any inferences as to what her little mind was thinking about when she uttered something she just learned from her "uncle"? If such a young age of children can be influenced in any capacity, it is this individuals belief that we as adults must seek the truism of the actions of others before we fly off the handle. I find it unfair and unfortunate that perhaps an innocent man died due to a father wanting to a vigolante by taking the law into his own hands. In any case, if the the jerk was inappropriate with the young girl he should have been brought to trial just like all the other sick people that have the tendancies to do this to children and then let the people that are in the prisons take care of them. Because that is what really would have happened. No one likes people taking advantage of children.

Answer 3

He took a life. No justification. What if he believed the guy had or was raping his 2 year old, killed him, then found out he actually wasn't. OOOOPS! Oh well, he thought he was. This nonsense is just that, nonsense. If we extrapolate that kind of thinking depending on who is in charge then an animal rights activist could claim justification for cutting the head off of a child who happened to be pulling on a puppy's tail. We have laws and courts for a reason. We wouldn't be a civilized society if we didn't. No one should get a medal for intentionally taking another human life. We as a species need to grow up.

Answer 4

I have not heard this story anywhere so I am voicing a jury type of opinion. You know not really knowing anything but from what you say.

First off rape is a far worse crime than justifiable murder in my eyes. I would send him on his way because he saved future children's lives.

Second, could you imagine your 2 year old being raped that would drive any man insane if he loved his child. That would drive any loving parent crazy to know that some filthy man was on their baby girl.

And third, can we really trust the court systems anymore. People get away with a lot more than rape.

I would have shot him and not blinked an eye while I did it. I would have felt no remorse whatsoever for the crime that I committed. I would not feel that it was a crime. It was justice served where it was due.

Answer 5

As a parent I think that I would probably do the same thing, I don't think the medal is a good idea but I do think that this is a very brave man who deserves our grattitude and respect for doing something that our courts fail to do.
Our court system is too easy on criminals that attack our children maybe they should wake up and smell the coffee, or maybe they should have to explain to the little girl why the man who hurt her gets to go free and do it again in a couple of years, I'm sure it would cause them to think twice. The penalty in Turkey is death to anyone who rapes a child it's time to make that a law here.

Answer 6

Not knowing the exact circumstances of the alleged child rapist.., unless the accused was caught red handed, one can never fully resolve if the person in question is guilty.

I knew a man who was accused of molesting his own 2-year old daughter and people were out to kill this man and the police took it at face value too.

In the end, it was a matter of his ex-wife's sister who hate the man for not fooling around with her. Now, this woman was a total vindictive b*tch without an ounce of scruples. She coaxed the man's daughter to say, "Daddy touched me. Daddy touched me pee-pee.

Sadly a young inexperienced wanna-be child psychologist started questioning (leading) the child. FORTUNATELY for whatever reason, a more experienced and smarter child psychologist entered the scene and established the child was coaxed as this little girl had no concept of what she was saying. All she knew was her daddy touched alright - (hugs, normal kisses, etc) but no sexual actions were indicated.

As I said - UNLESS THE ACCUSED IS CAUGHT RED HANDED - the Law needs to handle it and pray that its handled correctly. Could YOU imagine being in the shoes (God forbid) of someone who is falsely accused and no one believes you?

THINK MAN! THINK!
Again I don't know what the circumstances were in the case you mentioned, but suppose it was an ambiguous situation and this father killed an Innocent man.

Answer 7

hi, would nicely be we are complicated between 2 words. CHARGING and EXECUTING. Charging potential blaming someone for his/her ats. Executing potential giving punishments after identifying even if the action change into precise or incorrect. If the homicide befell, then expenditures will be presented. It merely shows that a homicide befell. this does no longer advise that the daddy is going to be punished. It merely signifies that the courtroom is now going to take heed to why the daddy killed the guy. surely, this also provides the daddy an danger to inform the folk what surely surpassed off. in the different case how will all of us understand what surely befell? So expenditures are presented on moves dedicated. Ofcourse, a cost on the lifeless guy will be presented accusing him of raping a minor. he's lifeless, yet this does no longer quit bringing of expenditures.because expenditures in worry-free words communicate of moves. listening to is the approach in which it really is determined even if the action change into precise or no longer. interior the listening to of courtroom, i'm confident, the daddy will be able to prepare that what he did change into the in worry-free words ingredient that would nicely be performed. The courtroom would call for the evidences, and research what anybody has to assert. If courtroom exhibits that the daddy is ideal, then the alternative will be suggested. i'm confident interior the case that you're speaking about, the alternative will be acquittal of the daddy. Execution occurs even as the judgement has been taken. in this section, the daddy will be acquitted. even as the rapist will be condemened pothumously. some more beneficial training will be surpassed to the police authorities to ascertain the safe practices of the electorate. So, charging will no longer be punishing. Charging in worry-free words potential testing, and identifying even if the objective of the action change into precise or incorrect.

Answer 8

Have you ever had an Adrenalin dump. You don't think, you don't reason, you just react, you're totally out of control. As far as the justice system, so many times it comes down to MONEY. Who's got the best attorney. And hell weren't the police terrified in New York a couple of years ago when they thought a man had a weapon and shot at him some 30 times hitting him 14 times while in an apartment complex. What happened to them. There's allot more out there!

Answer 9

If the father caught the man raping his 2 year old daughter he has the right to protect her. That's not murder in my state. It comes under the right to protect yourself and others around you. It is reasonable to assume that a grown man would kill a two year old, or do serious bodily harm in that situation.

Answer 10

Well the obvious reason is that the person accused of raping his 2 year old daughter is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. secondly, we cannot all beocme vigialaintes and take the law into our own hands. If we allow one person to get away with it, what message do we send to the public, (that if exigent or mitigating circumstances apply then we can all have a free pass to kill) how many peopel would then be engouraged to do thesame???? and where do we draw the line? Is it ok to kill the asswipe piece of **** that murders our kids? and then again its ok to kill the shithead who rapes our kids? whay if they jsut beat them up really bad and casue brain damage, no permanent damage? cause tem to lose an arm or leg. WHERE DSO WE DRAW THE LINE???????

THATS MY OFFICIAL OPINION, BUT IF SOEONE RAPED MY CHILD OR KIDNAPPED AND TORTORUED MY CHILDREN I WOULD KILL THEM WITH MY BARE HANDS