Is anyone else tired of hearing this same phrase repeated over and over again? Or is it true that democrats have no solutions?
2006-09-01 12:58:44 · 17 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no,, it's not true,,, if democrats merely stopped doing what the Bush neoconservatives are doing,, the world would become a better place,, for the secretary of defense to call American citizens Nazi appeasers,, is horrifying,, taxpayers pay billions for military and defense,, Rumsfeld is not suppose to be political with war,,, he needs to go study or something besides write political articles for the NY Times,, doesn't he have a job,,, Bush wants you to believe that your either with him or your against peace,, he's insane,,, he, Cheney, and the gang have to go as well,,, impeach them all,,,,
2006-09-01 16:58:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They may have some but have kept them pretty well under the covers for some years now...making the statement hold a pretty good amount of water. All they have done so far is spew out hate and derision. Nothing positive has come from their lips. Sort of like Kerry says, "It would be different if I had won". But never any indication of how it would be different.
I wonder why they dems continue to prove they are right, when making those statements. They offer nothing to contrast. and hate speech doesn't make the grade. Which seems; that is all the dems have to offer as a rebuttal.
2006-09-01 13:17:16 · answer #2 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As has been said by both sides the devil is in the details. The Democrats appear to feel if they give the deals in a step by step format the Republicans might steal it. Maybe they might instead fear that the people might see that their solution can't hold water.
If the solution & the consequences are good for the US who cares whom came up with the solution. We aren't talking about something to sell.
2006-09-01 13:08:28 · answer #3 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well no prominent Democratic candidate has come up with a viable solution for the mess in Iraq. Both sides agree just up and leaving will create a larger problem.
2006-09-01 13:07:27 · answer #4 · answered by heshootshescores3 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not the only thing that you will hear over and over again, look for "cut and run" that will be a main rebel call before the campaign is over. You just have to set down and listen to a democratic candidate to find out the plan. These repuke's that say we have no plan, will never get it. No matter how much you try to expain to them they are to mentally diminised to under stand anything but what is told to them on Faux News or what ever Rush Limbaugh says. Those two sources know how to keep it simple enough for the repuglicans to understand.
2006-09-01 13:05:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i imagine the nationwide safe practices purpose is a good one for Benghazi, and a nasty one for the AP and IRS scandals. there is not any tale with Benghazi, and proving that there is not any longer some thing to it ought to probable damage embassy safe practices (which hasn't been all that good in the years previous Obama both). i imagine the IRS scandal will finally end up to be no longer some thing a lot as well, notwithstanding the human beings have the right to draw close what handed off and it is going to probable be explored extra--and if the wide-spread public's idea of the tale the click is putting out is on the fringe of the mark, then there are extreme issues to fix. (If reality would not journey the present version, i can imagine of abuses of power via the republicans, yet as you communicate about, it would not do a good type of wonderful to communicate about each and every of the circumstances your fighters brush aside the structure and American concepts even as your area is going to do an same ingredient.) The AP scandal is the basically right out those. Like Bush ought to have even as he replaced into referred to as out via the libs on Gitmo and Valerie Plame, that is a danger for Obama to take fee and take duty. If he leads the authorities nicely and units up good anti-snooping/privateness chance-free practices guidelines (for everybody, no longer basically the authorities) and brings the authorities in accordance to that as basically right he can, then he can squash that scandal via turning it into an danger. If he leads in the different direction and is derived to a call to allow everybody use any training they could get their palms on adversarial to each person, he is going to really damage the Democrats and help the noticeably anti-authorities nutcases benefit help. i imagine the way he handles that one scandal will outline his administration--the different 'scandals', Obamacare, Bin weighted down--none of which will count number--all which will count number is not any matter if individuals nevertheless imagine they're residing in between the most loose countries in the international--and how he handles that should be the attempt. we prefer to make certain--is wikileaks the way ahead for information, is suppression the way ahead for information, or are we going to attempt to locate a nicely-balanced center floor (between loose/dishonest and managed/to blame, no longer left and actual) again?
2016-12-06 03:10:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't really see the democrats provdiving any solutions other than dissing Bush......Read the news people...Are there an solutions that the dems are offering other than pulling out of Iraq (which they can provide no logical reasoning for)?????
2006-09-01 13:02:15 · answer #7 · answered by cman 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Trust me, it's all a big bunch of B.S. There is no such thing as free elections. All elections are controlled by the Illuminati. They hold all power and authority over all governments. Whoever they want in power, they put in power. The system is rigged to look honest, but really it's not, I assure you. We have absolutely zero evidence whatsoever that votes are ever counted correctly.
2006-09-01 13:06:24 · answer #8 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is true that they seem to have no solutions. If they don't like the phrase, they should come up with some viable solutions and stop falling back on hate-Bush rhetoric.
2006-09-01 13:27:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've heard several solutions to several problems... but many of the best solutions were "you shouldn't do this" before the action was done... sometimes a solution is just to say "don't do it"...
but, just for kicks, what if we reversed the question... what are Republican solutions? I haven't heard any?
2006-09-01 13:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋