I saw on CNN that IRAN wanted to have a debate with the USA.
Brought to you by the "debates not wars club" and so as to say : FREEDOM CALLS.
Also by in part sponsored by the "bombs for books campaign". And referenced by "the guns for guitars campaign".
www.worldvision.20fr.com
I'd rather sell "bomb seiten" and "killer sodas" at the debate rather than sell bombs that immobilize children, cappish. (I hope you can catch the "bomb" slang) ~ WAV
2006-09-01 12:46:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The first guy in from level 5 was exposed by his own words, is he not your ordinary fool? And as far as "spamming" goes I have NEVER used "spam" technology in this life, so I do not know where that guy is getting off.....
as far as being a "psycho-path" well I was SYRINGE RAPED right here in the USA, so who is going to answer for that one?
And well I would suggest a sit down meetiing rather than a debate on most levels.
2006-09-01 13:01:37 · update #1
The fact is I or you or anyone at least here in the states does not seem to be getting the "truth" from the media.... at least that is what it seems like.
LEt's hope for VEGAN danish's all around. ~ we've had a bad life of slaughter....
2006-09-02 08:10:10 · update #2
GET ME KRAMER
and I'll bring the VEGAN DANISH.... tray's of development
I can taste the jelly on my mindright now.... I like the kind that has real fruit and the kind that is glazed up real good... as far as tea, what would you say... I need to learn more : HERBOLOGY
2006-09-03 05:43:18 · update #3
There are truths neither side knows. EAch side has grounded itself in yesterdays falsehoods. Anyone who ventures to shed any light on some of what's goiing on is shushed fast, because truth is outside conventionally approved belief..
The talk might do some good.
2006-09-06 12:25:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These two countries have diplomats who can talk and try to find common ground so they can make peaceful choices.
Debating other heads of state is not the role of a president. What could it accomplish? Some people would say that this person won the debate. Others would say the other one had won. It wouldn't lead to resolution fo differences. Each would be further entrenched in his position and be defending it, not trying to see the other's point of view.
2006-09-02 12:13:37 · answer #2 · answered by lottyjoy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I challenged Pete King to enter a debate with him and I will prove beyond any shred of doub that 9/11 is an Israeli act but he is running away. I told him that I will knock him down like Muhammad Ali did to Sony Liston but he is running around. Insha Allah I will catch him someday and show the world how this cheif of Home Land Secrutiy and Life time supporter of terrorism in Ireland is deceiving the entire world.
2006-09-01 19:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by pathowiz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets say you come home one day and find your family murdered. The person responsible for this Hannis crime is caught. I will bet you that you and your club members will be willing to sit down with this person over tea and danish and debate the reasons for there actions and when they express to you they were just having a bad day you will be satisfied with there response pay the tab and send them on there way.
2006-09-01 20:07:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The president of Iran is a psycopath that participated in taking American Hostages in the '70s.
Debate only makes sense if there is some possible exchange of ideas and the fact that he wants all Americans and Isrealis dead, kind of halts that notion.
2006-09-01 19:51:26 · answer #5 · answered by WheeeeWhaaaaa 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
While there is a legitimate question in there, you need to stop spamming this site.
I think that not opening your mouth and letting people think you are a fool is much wiser than having a debate.
2006-09-01 19:48:59 · answer #6 · answered by QuestionWyrm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELLO we were living in peace before these fricken crazy a@@ haters of the world came over here and BLEW up our families do you remember that or were you sleepin that day and the 2,185 after that. jeeze people
2006-09-07 22:15:01 · answer #7 · answered by jennifer e 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can not fathom how a debate between these two parties would make a difference.
2006-09-07 23:17:41 · answer #8 · answered by Fuzzy Wuzzy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would anyone in their right mind think such a debate would change any minds? When one mind is preaching hate and intent on killing you and all of .western civivlization. There is no negotiation possible, what value would a debate have??????????????????????????
2006-09-07 14:20:22 · answer #9 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man hell no .neither is competent enough to have a debate
2006-09-01 19:51:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋