murder
rape
sexual abuse
liberals
drugs
2006-09-01 12:23:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have nothing at hand to site, but I will give my personal top 5. Mind you that the difference between destroying and not using conservatively is in my *again* opinion a significant one.
In no particular order -
1. Slash and burning of the rainforests
2. Mechanical waste buildup
3. Meat diet favortism
4. Antiqued mining practices
5. Public lethargy and inaction (It's someone elses problem)
2006-09-01 12:31:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by fri_knight247 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Religious fundamentalism
2. Ignorance
3. Greed
4. Excessive consumption without a care for where the goods come from, and to hell with sustainability
5. Overpopulation
- in other words, supporting Bush.
2006-09-01 12:34:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by fiat_knox 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) Gas and smog released by cars and factories.
2) Hummers
3) littering and no one cleaning it up
4) War
5) Deforestation/Poaching/Hunting
Deforestation is major! Without those trees and rainforests in South America and anywhere else in the world, our oxygen level is being depleted despite the other trees and it is causing the eartch to warm up as well.
2006-09-01 13:11:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 using fuel for electricity and other things u know
2 cuting down trees
3 the agricultural type of cash crops (making food for sale only)
4 disturbance of ecosystems in places such as the rainforest of africa
5 the way capitalism works simply put!!!
2006-09-01 12:25:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by geosun 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
5. Pollution
4. Ignorance
3. Democracy
2. Political Correctivness
1. Over Population (Too Much 'whos your daddy' not enough 'oops! i might be a daddy')
2006-09-01 12:52:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mark-Y-Mark 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i choose NASA to no longer coach something to you. i choose you to start up making use of intelligence for as quickly as. WHY would all and sundry difficulty to circumvent panic if the tip of the international have been authentic? Why ought to I difficulty, as an occasion, which you agree directly to panic at present, while in some week we'd the two be lifeless? Astronomers and NASA are already telling the certainty. yet human beings choose to have confidence charlatans and, to conceal their tracks, the charlatans are going around asserting that NASA is mendacity to all human beings. So, you go with to have confidence charlatans, flow suited forward. And in case you go with to scare your self with ends-of-the-international, you need to get a head-start up on the subsequent end-of-the-international (would 19, 2013) that's in basic terms as pretend through fact the coming near one that's in basic terms as pretend through fact the only that in basic terms surpassed (Dec. 12, 2012), which, apparently, became into in basic terms as pretend through fact the tip of the international of would 27, 2012, itself faker than the October 21, 2011 end of the international, which became into in basic terms as pretend as... Why ought to we difficulty having to describe why each and each pretend end-of-the-international promise is pretend? in basic terms settle for that each and each end of the international prediction is pretend. you will shop a great number of time.
2016-12-18 03:19:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by schiavone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Driving to the supermarket for food
Cooking the food
Eating the food
Going to the toilet
Flashing the toilet
2006-09-01 12:42:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by sweetie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Destroying rain forests
Burning fossil fuels
Warmongering
Intensive farming
Building too much
2006-09-01 12:59:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by teddy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
*A lack of care and a conscience toward nature and using more natural resources faster than the resources can replenish.
*Toxic gas emissions into the air from machinery (business and cars, trucks)
*Overpopulation
*Building and paving over it
*Destruction of the rainforests
2006-09-01 13:23:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Goldenrain 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Overpopulation
2. Human love of comfort
3. Human love of money
4. Human love of laziness
5. Human egoism
2006-09-01 12:31:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by cityexplorer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋