2006-09-01 11:41:34 · 13 answers · asked by Ryan P 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I believe it is not a good trade. It's not good or bad. Keenan McCardell has been around forever but he has proven himself. He's proven to be productive for several years. Michael Clayton is all just potential and hasn't proven anything yet. He did have one good year but he's with a young QB is Simms and there's no guarantee he'll be a consistent QB. Then again, you have the same situaion with Rivers and San Diego. It's a tough call, but I would expect more consistent numbers with Keenan and flashes of explosiveness with Clayton. Keep in mind, Keenan ended last year on a great note! He was playing great.
2006-09-01 11:47:06 · answer #1 · answered by vmdv15 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If you are getting McCardell, take him. Michael Clayton has been inconsistent throughout his brief career. McCardell has been consistently solid. He does, however, have a young, inexperienced QB in Rivers, but until he proves he's not capable of putting up good fantasy numbers, you should make this trade.
2006-09-01 19:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Pankalicious! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes trade Clayton for McCardell... Cardell is better has a WR.. Clayton had a really bad year last year.
2006-09-01 21:09:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are receiving Clayton, no. If you are receiving McCardell, yes. I would start Clayton every week. I would only start McCardell if I had no one else to start.
2006-09-01 18:47:39 · answer #4 · answered by defiantlysisko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no..McCardell is rated much higher on fantasy depth charts..and McCardell is the #1 receiver in San Diego, but Clayton will be watching galloway catching all the balls.
2006-09-01 19:05:03 · answer #5 · answered by Sir_caterpillar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep clayton, he will be more productive this year. Rivers will suck and simms will be big with galloway and clayton. Dont take into account previous years b.c theres too much changes for anyone to predict anything, and when theres this much uncertainty, go with the younger player b/c he has a chance to explode.
2006-09-02 00:42:45 · answer #6 · answered by leonard washington 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
think about it this way. clayton has simms and his in a contract year. mccardell has rivers and as you know is still considered a rookie. hope this helps.
2006-09-01 19:22:23 · answer #7 · answered by Rusty Shackleford 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty even if I had to choice I would take McCardell
2006-09-01 20:36:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say do it if you get Clayton....I think he could be big this year.
2006-09-01 18:55:42 · answer #9 · answered by hawksfan17 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats really a toss up. Both have good potential.
2006-09-04 16:15:52 · answer #10 · answered by jrollo76 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋