English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some constructive answers would be appreciated from you libertards (but not expected)

2006-09-01 09:35:57 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

the U N sux

2006-09-01 09:38:13 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 1 2

both the Dem's' and re pubs' can hardly agree on some thing even even as they choose an same ingredient. except you pass to c-span you gained't see a lot coverage of third social gathering applicants. great companies make huge contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how a lot you are able to donate to a candidate in my opinion. companies set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the hot financial disaster guidelines were written via the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them in the butt. the different challenge is that some human beings vote for a million social gathering each and every of the time,both because they help that social gathering each and every of the time and trust that is the actually social gathering to do whats actual,or they're dissatisfied with the different social gathering for some reason. both activities choose it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I examine on the web very last nighttime is even 0.5 actual,this election ought to no longer count number besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a substantial disaster before the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will develop into the actual power of authorities. If it takes position after the elections and before the recent president takes place of work,i do not comprehend what's going to take position. G.W. signed an authorities order for the continuity of authorities and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the structure and the President should be the team spirit authorities. Congress and the perfect courtroom will nevertheless exist yet ought to have little or no voice,the President has the perfect say in all concerns. there replaced into also yet another website speaking about the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. structure will be lengthy gone.

2016-12-06 02:58:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You ask for a constructive answer and then call people "libertards"??? North Korea is more of a threat to the world than Iran ever will be. When you can come up with enough gray matter to pose an intelligent question get back to us.

2006-09-01 12:30:22 · answer #3 · answered by carpediem 5 · 0 0

Iran is hopefully just posturing in the knowledge that someone will bomb their enrichment plants and probably all the other nuclear facilities it has if it does not stop. It is a simple matter that virtually every country recognises that Iran would be mad enough to use an atomic weapon even if it meant it would face massive retaliation. They are hoping for political advantage and that the US will give them a lot to stop it but the US and every other country knows this sort of blackmail must not succeed.

They can have electricity producing reactors until the countries covered in them. No one is trying to stop that.

It is difficult to see what realistically can be done short of bombing if they do not stop. Sanctions would take for ever to hurt them and would hurt the west much more in loosing access to all that oil.

If Iran does not start talking sense and back away from enrichment fairly soon then the consequences may be catastrophic for the country. They will leave the world no choice.

Forget Iraq and Afghanistan, if there is the slightest chance of Iran getting the bomb it must be bombed before it uses it to kill millions of innocent people and takes suicide bombing into the third world war scenario!

Therefore the only answer seems to be to demonstrate to them that all the major countries in the world are united in saying if they do not stop processes that can produce weapons grade material they WILL be bombed.

Sad isn't it?

2006-09-01 09:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The UN will and should do nothing. Who cares if Iran has a nuclear program? They are no more of a worry than Korea. If this was such a big deal, don't you think the Saudis would be doing something about it? You think Russia doesn't have a stake in the peace and safety of the region? Why should we be the ones who are afraid of every possibility?

The UN should be focusing on things it can actually influence, like relieving some of the genocide in southern Africa. Or trying to broker some kind of sensible arrangement between Lebanon and Israel and Syria.

Saber rattling at Iran is ridiculous. Should we make another Iraq out of Iran? Just because GWB says to? I hope not.

2006-09-01 09:44:19 · answer #5 · answered by Monica M 2 · 1 1

The UN should impose very harsh sanctions on Iran, so that Iran has no or very few trading partners. I support the people of Iran, I have several close Iranian friends - but I detest the government. Though sanctions are a very blunt instrument they may bring Iran back to the table, and make them more willing to negotiate the return of UN inspectors to ALL Iranian nuclear facilities.

If after say 6 months of these sanctions Iran still refuses to comply then the UN should bomb the nuclear facilities - but only if there is an assurance of MINIMAL civilian casualties. If there's a possibility of there being a nuclear meltdown then the UN should seek a different solution.

What a shame that Bush lost all credibility chasing imaginary WMDs in Iraq, when just around the corner there is a very real probability that Iran is seeking to develop them.

2006-09-01 09:41:36 · answer #6 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1 0

The sad truth the UN is going to do what ever the path of least resistance or what makes them the most money. They are no longer respected except by a few liberals and they will do nothing to Iran. Someone is going to die due to the inaction of the UN. I just pray it isn't Americans. I think it will be Isreal. but Iran can also reach Europe. Who knows.

2006-09-01 09:48:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nothing it's none of the U.S.'s business; Amerika has about armed the whole world with nukes; Amerika is just looking for a fight to reduce it's white population so it can replace them with migrant workers for the rich; Amerika is now the rich and the sweatshop workers.

2006-09-01 09:56:51 · answer #8 · answered by Mark B 2 · 1 0

We've seen what happens when UN resolutions are ignored.. Nothing. The organization is impotent, especially when it comes to defense/stability. Corruption abounds and Americans pay most of the tab.

2006-09-01 09:41:41 · answer #9 · answered by maxima 5 · 0 1

Treat them as a Nation which wants to have
something to protect themselves from being
invaded by a Nation with a huge thirst for oil.

2006-09-01 09:45:30 · answer #10 · answered by Answers 5 · 1 1

I don't think they should do anything, if the Iranians want to build nuclear power stations then fine, but the line has to be drawn before they build nukes.

2006-09-01 09:41:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers