By far a foot I think people rely more on their hands than their feet they have so many good prosthetics for the legs and I think it is more likely to be more helpful to use your hands with crutches than to not have 2 hands to help you do so many things might I add it would be horrible to lose either
2006-09-01 09:23:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by ThePearl412 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely a foot. The foot prosthetics are better than the hand ones & less noticable.
2006-09-01 16:35:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Darma 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A foot. There are prosthetics for feet to make you walk but you could never fully get hand movement again!
2006-09-01 16:18:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jenny 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is creepy, but I would have to say foot, so that I could still use both hands to put on my artificial foot.
2006-09-01 18:49:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sincere Questioner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
foot. need the hands.
2006-09-01 16:18:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a question.....What made you think of something like this?? I suppose well......a foot cuz i love my hands plus its easier for a replacement (fake one)
2006-09-01 16:21:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a foot cos false feet are alot closer to the real thing than false hands, do you really need to be able to wigglt you toes? no. but your fingers? i think so
2006-09-01 16:19:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummmm.... foot.... cause i could get a fake one... like those high tech ones ... but if you lost a hand you would never be able to you it again.... if you got a fake one... it wouldn't do anything... you know what i mean... but if i lost a leg... i wouldn't really be able to do many sports so that would suck ... but still a leg... =]
2006-09-01 16:20:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Foot, absolutely!
Tenth of the way there!
2006-09-01 16:23:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say the foot. not as noticable.
2006-09-01 16:19:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by morgan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋