do you believe the US should leave the United Nations?

Question

is the UN too unwieldy a forum for the US to pursue its foreign policy

Answer 1

Yes, we should leave the United Nations. It is a group that typically sides against the US no matter what, but doesn't mind taking the funds the US gives. The US is the single biggest contributor to the UN and for what? We could do more for the world without that corrupt organization. It is totally corrupt by the way.

Answer 2

the US stopped caring about the UN a long time ago. They are there because it would be a scandal if they leave, remember that the US was created to keep the peace in the world, and in some point of history, it was good and trustworthy when a country was part of the UN.
The US should not leave the UN, but the UN should change their protocol and policy, like the Security Council veto

Answer 3

I think the US should be leave the UN immediately. I also wish the US had the cajones to kick the UN out of New York (and The United States) and the UN relocate to Ghana, home of the great idiot, Kofi Annan. The UN is a joke and is successful at nothing more than allowing a bunch of 3rd world delegates to live it up in the US.
Also, it irks the heck out of me that the President of the US, regardless of liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, has to answer to someone as Mr. President, in his own damn country!!!! Ban the UN NOW!!!!

Answer 4

I find this kind of talk absolutely hilarious. Are you aware that the US set up the UN? Remember that horrible conflict called World War Two? The modern UN is the outgrowth of the Grand Alliance that defeated Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan. Leaving it would be yet another US retreat and represent a return to isolationism (but my money is on you being pro-war, am I right?)

Answer 5

The U.N. is corrupt and useless,full of nations that hate democracy and the U.S.
We can stay in it but we should pay a lot less in dues.
I also agree with the person who said the U.N. should move out of this country,let all these useless 4th & 5th world diplomats run up parking tickets & whatever else on some other part of the globe.

Answer 6

The US should stay, although I don't see why they would , they pay most of the money and are the only ones to enforce the UN sanctions. The French should be thrown off the security council
what did they do to deserve that position, surrender to the Nazi's so the US could save them.

Answer 7

Iran isn't a nuclear threat to united statesa., although if it easily is a nuclear threat to different international locations interior the area, rather Israel. I additionally think of that if Iran had tactical, short-selection nuclear weapons, it would be susceptible to apply them against US and allied forces presently working in Afghanistan and Iraq. For those reasons, the possession of an offensive nuclear capacity with the help of Iran is a severe destabilizing ingredient interior the area. the different united states of america in the international that has better nuclear technologies for non violent purposes (i.e., to offer electric powered capacity) has allowed IAEA inspectors to envision their software. Iran has no longer. Why? What does it would desire to conceal if its software is thoroughly non violent? that is why that is definitely one of those massive deal.

Answer 8

I would like to say yes, but I can't. The UN is a very corrupt organization, but staying in helps us keep an Eye on them. I do think that we should drastically reduce funding.

Answer 9

Whether you like it or not the UN has helped squash any chance of a World War 3.

Answer 10

NO! The United States, or I should say, the current occupants of the White House are pompous asses and if they have their way, they will manage to isolate our nation and insure that EVERYONE on the planet hates us.

We should stay in the United Nations and we should take responsibility for the horrific things we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan