English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-01 09:05:27 · 17 answers · asked by devonlad06 1 in News & Events Current Events

17 answers

bradford

2006-09-01 09:10:57 · answer #1 · answered by bigandy1005 2 · 0 1

The economy of Liverpool is beginning to recover from its long, post-World War II decline. Between 1995 and 2001 GVA per head grew at 6.3% annum. This compared with 5.8% for inner London and 5.7% for Bristol. The rate of job growth was 9.2% compared with a national average of 4.9% for the same period, 1998-2002. However, Liverpool is still comparatively poor; a 2001 report by CACI showed that Liverpool still had four of the ten poorest postcode districts in the country

2006-09-01 16:14:36 · answer #2 · answered by JoDe 3 · 0 0

every Town and city has a poor and rich area. But Richmond in London is the poorest ;-)

2006-09-02 07:39:46 · answer #3 · answered by Better life @ Better world.com 1 · 0 1

Buckingham Palace.

2006-09-02 18:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lancaster

2006-09-01 16:50:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Parts of London are socially deprived, notably the south east of London, despite the glossy picture painted of it.

2006-09-01 16:12:03 · answer #6 · answered by 675 3 · 1 0

Isle of Wight.

2006-09-01 18:54:28 · answer #7 · answered by Jabba_da_hut_07 4 · 0 0

Oxford, full of unemployable students

2006-09-01 16:14:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i wouldnt like to say, evey town/city has its poor areas.

2006-09-01 16:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by vicky l 6 · 0 0

you wouldn't half set the cat amongst the pigeons to answer that one

2006-09-05 08:17:40 · answer #10 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 0 0

london

2006-09-05 05:44:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers