bradford
2006-09-01 09:10:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by bigandy1005 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The economy of Liverpool is beginning to recover from its long, post-World War II decline. Between 1995 and 2001 GVA per head grew at 6.3% annum. This compared with 5.8% for inner London and 5.7% for Bristol. The rate of job growth was 9.2% compared with a national average of 4.9% for the same period, 1998-2002. However, Liverpool is still comparatively poor; a 2001 report by CACI showed that Liverpool still had four of the ten poorest postcode districts in the country
2006-09-01 16:14:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by JoDe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
every Town and city has a poor and rich area. But Richmond in London is the poorest ;-)
2006-09-02 07:39:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Better life @ Better world.com 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Buckingham Palace.
2006-09-02 18:27:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lancaster
2006-09-01 16:50:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parts of London are socially deprived, notably the south east of London, despite the glossy picture painted of it.
2006-09-01 16:12:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by 675 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Isle of Wight.
2006-09-01 18:54:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jabba_da_hut_07 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oxford, full of unemployable students
2006-09-01 16:14:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i wouldnt like to say, evey town/city has its poor areas.
2006-09-01 16:11:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by vicky l 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you wouldn't half set the cat amongst the pigeons to answer that one
2006-09-05 08:17:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by srracvuee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
london
2006-09-05 05:44:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋