I agree. and if you need more evidence of a creator read "the case for faith" by (i cant remember now)
however you worded the question badly. someone who denies the existence of a creator would not accept the assumption that the world we live in is a "creation". get it.
they would say our reality is here by some other cosmic event or not even attempt to explain how so much "matter" ie physical material happened to organize itself so well. get it.
still yours is an interesting question.
2006-09-01 08:20:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by applicationenhancer 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obviously, if there is a creation, it follows there must be a creator.
2006-09-01 15:15:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scabius Fretful 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only if you call it a creation. If you call it the universe, it does not imply a creator
2006-09-01 15:12:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by October 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
it is a bit trickier than that. you see, creation has no beginning and no end.
2006-09-01 16:02:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes its called TIME
2006-09-01 15:17:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by MJGarcia 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes just like it rains bcuz plants need it. circular logic helps no one.
2006-09-01 15:11:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not really
2006-09-01 15:13:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No
2006-09-01 15:11:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd say so.
2006-09-01 15:11:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋