English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-01 08:06:11 · 9 answers · asked by chosen_isaiah61 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

9 answers

I agree. and if you need more evidence of a creator read "the case for faith" by (i cant remember now)

however you worded the question badly. someone who denies the existence of a creator would not accept the assumption that the world we live in is a "creation". get it.

they would say our reality is here by some other cosmic event or not even attempt to explain how so much "matter" ie physical material happened to organize itself so well. get it.

still yours is an interesting question.

2006-09-01 08:20:44 · answer #1 · answered by applicationenhancer 1 · 1 0

Obviously, if there is a creation, it follows there must be a creator.

2006-09-01 15:15:41 · answer #2 · answered by Scabius Fretful 5 · 1 0

Only if you call it a creation. If you call it the universe, it does not imply a creator

2006-09-01 15:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by October 7 · 0 1

it is a bit trickier than that. you see, creation has no beginning and no end.

2006-09-01 16:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5 · 0 0

Yes its called TIME

2006-09-01 15:17:33 · answer #5 · answered by MJGarcia 2 · 0 1

yes just like it rains bcuz plants need it. circular logic helps no one.

2006-09-01 15:11:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not really

2006-09-01 15:13:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No

2006-09-01 15:11:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'd say so.

2006-09-01 15:11:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers