English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

Bush needs to be given a task he can handle, like counting the number of times his cellmate rapes him.

2006-09-01 08:52:58 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0 5

Cover what crimes? What's there to cover? Most of Bush's stupid moves were done in the public eye (hence why this site is flooded with Bush Bashers).

BTW... F- The Democrats!

Vote Independant. This country needs free thinkers who represent the people, not a choice between two schmucks who represent the views of their party.

2006-09-01 15:05:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan 4 · 2 1

No crimes to worry about - although that wont stop Democrats (if they take over the Senate) from launching impeachment proceedings - they'll play that out until '08 just in time for the next presidential election.

2006-09-01 15:05:18 · answer #3 · answered by Will 6 · 1 0

He's already trying to get legislation passed that would retroactively change the definition of War Crimes (18 USC 2441) so that the actions he committed and ordered could not be prosecuted.

{EDIT}

It's really sad how many people just blindly assert that Bush is not a criminal, without ever reading the laws in question and without ever reading the actual Supreme Court and federal court rulings on the subject. Almost as if the facts and the law don't matter to them when forming their opinions.

2006-09-01 15:04:54 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 2

Maybe he doesn't even need to do that because in American politics the two parties are just like two sides of the same coin and the whole election is just a scam to keep the people believing their vote counts and amusing them.Maybe he can count on his democratic friends to not go after him.
Bread and games like the empire of Rome called it.

2006-09-01 15:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0 0

What do you mean by A democrate will take congress? The republican party won't let that happen. The only crime would be letting the democrates take congress in November.

2006-09-01 15:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by Gigglesalot 3 · 1 1

No. November doesn´t change anything, he´ll have a minimum of 2 more years for that (unless they hijack another election.) By the way, you seem to have the conception that the democrats aren´t criminal as well. Are you really sure about that? Seems to me it takes two to tango.

2006-09-01 15:15:37 · answer #7 · answered by Tristansdad 3 · 1 1

if bush committed crimes, do you think impeachment is good enough punishment? If I committed the same crimes he did, I would be put to death!

For the people who don't believe Bush is a crimminal: Bush has broken over 750 laws. Including lying about Iraq - that cause US imperialistic, military expansion in the middle-east so corporations can have more control over the oil and killed US troops, and Iraqis, raised violence level significantly in the Mid East. He spent 1.6 billion of taxpayers dollars on proganda. He claims himself exempt from breaking laws and ordering military to do inhumane things - like torture.

2006-09-01 15:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 1 3

you wish... You'll be spewing even more of your hate filled liberal venom here on Yahoo answers come November when you will find out that your liberal left leaning socialist friends will have lost even more seats in the Congress. Now if Democrats could actually come up with "moderate" candidates instead of the liberal loonies they choose, there might be hope, but we all know that y'all don't have that much common sense.

2006-09-01 15:05:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

He's smart enough to try. But even Congressional paper trails are hard to cover up. If the Dems reclaim Congress, I smell either censure or impeachment in Dubya's future. And he's scared poopless over that prospect, you betcha........

2006-09-01 15:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers