Gee, I guess ol' Dubya and the conservatives aren't so stupid, huh? Still have yet to see a good plan, and maybe those people who are saying "We never should have been there in the first place" should have some of the chemical and biological weapons they found over there (yes, they WERE there, I have eye-witness accounts from my fellow soldiers) delivered to their doorsteps. Better yet, maybe they'd like to sponsor one of the 200+ Al-Qaeda operatives captured in Iraq (again, eye-witness accounts). And how about that suggestion to turn it over to the U.N.?!?!!?!?!!! ROFLMAO...like the U.N. has been able to solve anything in the last two decades...PLEASE!!!
2006-09-01 07:46:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by sarge927 7
·
5⤊
7⤋
Try to write in English, please. It's "shouldn't HAVE", not "shouldn't OF".
Now, my plan-
We get all the loudmouth conservative warmongers who never served in combat to go over there and show us how it's done.
The list would include:
George W. "Mission Accomplished" Bush
Dick "Last Throes" Cheney
Rush "My *** Hurts" Limbaugh
Bill O'Reilly
Tom DeLay
Joe Scarborough
Dennis Hastert
John Ashcroft
Trent Lott
Dan Quayle
Brit Hume
Roger Ailes
Bill Kristol
Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Ted Nugent
Karl "Bush's Brain" Rove
Paul Wolfowitz
Scooter Libby
Donald Rumsfeld
David Limbaugh
William Bennett
Newt Gingrich
Sean Hannity
Michael Savage
Gary Bauer
Spencer Abraham
Eliot Abrams
John Bolton
Andy Card
Don Evans
Asa Hutchinson
Richard Perle
Jerry Falwell
Pat Robertson
Jeb Bush
Roy Blunt
Saxby Chambliss.
They should make all the terrorists drop dead immediately.
From laughter.
2006-09-01 08:11:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by marianddoc 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Conservatives shout "Cut and Run!" at any mention of a plan, trying to fix the idea that no plan exists.
But John Murtha has been putting forward a plan for months now. The very bare bones:
-- To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
-- To create a quick reaction force in the region.
-- To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
-- To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq
This is NOT about simply abruptly pulling out and leaving things alone. It's changing our presence so we can still react to incidents as necessary, but we leave the Iraqis to actually, you know, run the country.
P.S. What the heck is the Republican plan? "Stay the Course"? "Adapt to Win"? Those aren't plans, those are slogans.
2006-09-01 08:26:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zhimbo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
An important objective would be to tightly secure the borders as to deter any insurgent/terrorist from a foreign country to enter Iraq or smuggle weapons into Iraq. After this we can increase the training and numbers of the Iraqi Army, start having them take over some of our minor objectives and like biskit said, have the UN soldiers come in to help with the peace keeping process as we slowly pull out.
2006-09-01 07:48:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fiesty Redhead 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Send in the transport, load the troops on board and take off, just as you did in Vietnam. Let the Iraqis take care of themselves. You shouldn't have gone there and destroyed their country in the first place. Now someone else will have to come and pay to clean up the mess you've made. Too bad they won't be able to resurrect all the innocent people you've killed for Bush's big LIE. It won't happen because they want to keep their big oil grab.
2006-09-01 08:02:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Gadfly 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Way to stereotype. You must be well-informed. I am a liberal and I don't want to leave Iraq. The car is already upside down in the ditch with people inside, we have to fix the problem. Instead of playing partisan politics, how about you grow up and ask real questions instead of trying to pit people against each other. Americans aren't born blue or red. Eventually, we have to leave Iraq. That is what we promised when we started the conflict, so we need to keep our word. At the same time, we can't leave the country right now and destabilize the region even more than we already have. Please, grow up. Not every liberal believes the same thing, and just because someone doesn't agree with the majority of the policies of your precious Bush, it doesn't mean that we are any less informed, or that we live in some sort of idealistic world completely detached from humanity.
2006-09-01 07:43:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by TheSilence 1
·
5⤊
4⤋
I know you want the Liberal plan, but I am not, so therefore cannot speak for them...But I will give you my 2 cents anyways, well my Hubby's 2 cents, not mine..."Blow them all to shreds, and make a nice big flat parking lot of the area...Then we can all have a big Nascar racing track, with lots of room to park and have fun(and mine as well take out France while we are at it")...and if any of them do survive, we can pay them (or not) to get us our beer. How does that sound?
2006-09-01 08:18:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by yoohoosusie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wait, how long have we been there now? 3-4 years. Our training efforts have been so so because of the looming civil war about to start there. I think us pulling out is moot because we will have to "supervise" another election or watch a coup. Some situation you guys have got us into. But also....there is Iran next door. So pulling out makes no since if we are within a few 1oo miles of our next objective. Count on another 10= years of occupation and another LBJ type president inheriting a horrible political phuc up. I have no idea what to do. We are screwed. I'm not happy to gain the white house this way, but this is a lose lose situation for the U.S. I wish we all could get on the same page without political bias.
2006-09-01 07:46:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
i've actually got one.
check it out... what if we invited iran to help us govern it? part of the problem we're experiencing in that part of the world is that we have burnt all our capital and are not trusted by the locals. the iraqi security forces we are training are not under our control and that is pretty scary because it sounds a lot like the people we are training are making the country less stable.
diplomacy is a great tool. it would be profound if we began trying to deal with the biggest dog over there in a way that implied that we wanted to help and make genuine alliances rather than just give everyone the finger all the time. if we began working with big names in their world, maybe it would take some of the wind out of the sails of the fundamentalist movement...
2006-09-01 07:45:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by uncle osbert 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Biskit has it right.
Finally an answer well thought out and presented,
This is the kind of democrat I would vote for in a heartbeat. one who thinks through a plan and then can implement it.
i've usually voted republican, but not anymore. im going 3rd party, but i will keep an eye out for politicians like biscuit, who actually have something constructive to say.
if the rest of the democrats wanted to truly win, they would adopt a ideology similiar to this.
they have the chance right here right now.
instead of bashing, focus on the future.
partisanship is killing this country.
2006-09-01 07:46:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by digital genius 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
When will you people get it through your heads that America does not return from Wars.
We still have troops in Guantanamo From the Spanish American War. That conflict ended 103 years ago.
We will close all the bases in Germany before we leave Iraq.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-01 07:50:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by 43 5
·
1⤊
1⤋