you are abslolutely right, the people are Islamic Fascists and Fundamentalists. But do you realize that liberals always want to call black people African Americans. The majority of Black people in america dont even come from africa. They can come from all carribbean countries, but in an attempt to be politically correct the actually are rascist. Oops, liberals are rascist.
2006-09-01 06:50:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It is absolutely wrong for a president to use such strong words on a set of people who have strongly supported a government at home and who have been sympathetic to the government in the past. Some Muslims may be facists but the present attacks on Muslim communities and shabby treatment of Muslim prisoners have created more facists among Muslims than any other time in recent history.
Commentaries made by presidents are laws and represent the official position of the country the president comes from. This would simply put more pressure on the poor Arab leaders that have been trying to convince their people that US has good intentions towards them.
2006-09-01 07:17:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey, the words "Islamic" & "Facist" have been overused to described the bad guys. Bush should of used "Criminials", "Kidnappers" and "Serial Killers". Those words have much more sting and it keeps us from glorifying the bad guys.
These criminal organizations want to be called terrorists and facists. It feeds their psychological agendas, which is to keep us Westerners fearful of them. More fear means our lives will be disrupted, we will get stressed out (PSTD anyone?), we will then quit thinking, and it will make us easier to kill.
Having been raised around military, I'm not happy with the treatment the military have been giving civillians and those who haven't been tried in the courts. If Michael Moore's documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11 is true, then those who are committing these crimes are probably not born & bred military. When I was growing up, I was taught about honor, teamwork, and courage. And self control was also taught in many military homes I saw. I'm only 29 years old by the way so that wasn't too long ago.
The people commiting the crimes are [most likely] gang kids in uniform. Probably some have criminal records. When I've worked with these kids in my neighborhoods, the ones with criminal records do lie about their pasts. It's only when they get caught again that you find out about their past. Some of these kids even have warrants at such a young age! In times of war, the military doesn't care if you are a criminal or not. The only question on their mind is can you obey orders and kill?
2006-09-04 21:54:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Curious Student 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe you need to stick with cable news. MSNBC, FOXNews, and a few others seem more than enough to drum up the neocon propaganda. What was it? Oh, Saddam had WMD and was posed to use them any week unless we attacked. But with our ultra techno battle gear it would all be over i about 101 days with the soldier riding down the street with Iraqi children cheering and waving, tossing roses in their path. the Iraqi girls squealing like they were rock stars, and all the adults saluting. We were going to have a US friendly puppet government and an oil insurance policy for when we went to democratize Iran(by force)and the Saudis(by political coercion). There would be maybe 12 US deaths and 8 of those would be by accident. Apparently it worked. They got many a dim bulb to believe it. And those who said it would turn out like it has were mad. Look who was right?
2006-09-01 07:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Twit. Islam and Facism are 2 completely different, and incompatible, beliefs and causes.
Secondly, Derban is not hte most powerful man on the planet. So what if he thinsk that? Its disgraceful that a head of state can act and talk in such a bullish manner.
BTW, i challenge you to tell me how the media is 'Liberal'. Fox, CNN, all of them are owned by a small group of companies, all sympathetic to the Republican cause.
2006-09-01 06:56:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by thomas p 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
insurrection -a individual who rises in armed resistance against a longtime government or ruler. Terrorist- a individual who makes use of terrorism interior the pursuit of political goals. Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, regularly violent, extraordinarily as a ability of coercion. The Syrians are literally struggling with a actual combat against a longtime protection tension. What the Tea party is doing I have no theory.
2016-11-06 05:45:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by sikorski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well it's not really a word, bush ain't that bright and the prisons run under bush's watch are illegal and make America look as bad as the terrorist.
2006-09-01 06:54:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached, and tried, and convicted of high treason of the United States of America.
2006-09-01 17:12:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals in general are rascists and antisemetic. Although they will argue themselves blue in the face denying it.
Truth is something that fails to come from the leftist media outlets in this country. All are mouthpieces of Moveon.org or the DNC whackjobs.
I don't watch the news outlets for that reason, why should we subject ourselves to "truthspeak" or "newspeak" (to borrow from Orwell)...
The fact is that the "war on terror" is in fact a war against islamic fascism. We are in WWIII, and it's high time we wake up the fact we are in 1938 and Mahmood is building a bomb. My question is where will the next Pearl Harbor be, that will be enough to shake people out of the partisan bickering and get behind the effort.
2006-09-01 06:58:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
what news site the media is to general
2006-09-01 06:51:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋