i would've prefered to have made the choice myself.
but, in my day, this was done almost automatically to every male, at least every male born in a hospital.
oh well---i don't know what i'm missing cause i never had it to begin with.
2006-09-06 16:10:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
About 80% of the world is intact (that is - NOT circumcised). They have no special health, hygiene, or social problems.
The only developed countries where non-religious circumcision is prevalent are the US and South Korea. In The Philippines, most pubescent males undergo a voluntary Foreskin Cutting procedure known supercision, but nothing is removed and there is no "cutting around" as implied by the word circumcision.
I CAN give you a rough idea how many circ victims prefer to be DE-circumcised. I've personally helped over 7000 men undertake foreskin restoration in the past 3 years. Even if there were only 4 other service providers like myself, then over 10,000 men per year (mostly in the US but also worldwide) are so disgusted with their circumcisions that they take up non-surgical restoration.
-Ron
2006-09-01 14:12:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by tlctugger 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Honestly, I could care less what a woman's pussy looks like as long as its healthy and functional. I don't see why it should be any different for my penis. It's a tiny piece of skin, has many benefits, is natural, and when its in your c*nt you cant even tell if its cut or not. Female circumcision has been proven to reduce HIV and STD rates, but obviously we don't go there because its "dehumanizing" and "anti-woman". Anybody else see the hypocricy here?
If I came home with a woman, and she took a look at my cock and saw that it was uncut, and refused to f*ck me as a result, I would kick that shallow b*tch out of my house asap. And if she really pissed me off I'd try to verbally objectify her as much as possible, because it'd be how I felt.
If your circumcised that's fine, your parents made a decision for you and you may or may not be happy with it. But the way I see it, no need to fix something that isn't broken. We are born with something there, and for almost entirely religious-based reasons we remove a piece of a skin. Why not just get rid of our appendix and tonsils at birth? And the infection thing is just bullshit. People should clean their entire bodies when they shower, and hygiene shouldn't be an issue. I can understand a woman not wanted to be with a man for hygiene issues, I wouldn't want to be with a smelly *** dirty woman, but being natural doesn't equate to being unhygenic. A dirty p*ssy is far more unpleasant than the tip of a dirty cock, the solution? Clean yourself and you'll be fine.
Also, a circumcised penis looks unnatural. They look they were butchered by some machine. With the scar, the difference in color, and not to mention the unlucky guys who get some botched circumcison and end up missing a chunk of their cock or having some other random deformity. Why put your baby through the unnecessary look for some cosmetic reason? Isn't your baby fine and beautiful the way it came out of you?
I think it's largely ignorance, and shows how much American society cannot make decisions for themselves and are superficial. Most of the rest of the non-Jewish/non-Muslim world don't see why they need to waste money, waste resources, endanger a child's life, perform an unnecessary surgery on new life, for a completely cosmetic procedure. If your a grown man, and decide that having a circumcised penis is what you want, than that's great, you're making a decision and that's fine. I don't think it's ANY different from plastic surgery.
2006-09-01 08:03:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not me! I was cut 50 years ago at the age of 6. I hate it!
It gets sore from running on my treadmill, or when I drive equipment on rough ground all day.
They say cut guys have more "staying power" because of the reduced sensitivity. How do you think it makes you feel when she asks "Are you soon done?"
Its like running a marathon every time we have sex, and if she dosn't feel like running a marathon guess what, no sex. Can't blame her she's still sore from the last run.
Dry cloth is about the only thing I can feel, my wife's vagina is not made of dry cloth.
The pro-cutters claim we no longer need the foreskin's protection since we don't run naked thru the brush. Have you ever watched any of the "Funniest Vidios" shows and all the crotch shots guys take. Many of those shots are not just hits to the balls but also hit the penis and I know from experience some of those blows are sufficent to break the skin of an exposed glans, right thru denim pants. Getting a finger nail ripped off did not compare to the pain of a lacerated glans. Didn't even mark my blue jeans.
As far as what girls think about it, b.j.s are nice but girls seem to decide "your dick tastes funny" once they have tasted wedding cake anyway and you will be left with a half numb stick for the rest of your life. And for intercourse she will have to exercise to maintain a tight vagina or you will be looking for a younger tighter one. If we are going to build our mates with a list of options, she would be better with a boob job too!
Nobody should be circumcised before age 18 when he can make his own decision.
His body His choice
2006-09-07 08:18:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
if i fell in love with a man before I found out whether he was circumcised or not, I wouldn't reject him if he wasn't circumcised, but I really would always prefer that he was. Circumcised, in my opinion, really is cleaner and nicer, and luckily, almost all of the men I have been with were. Some women don't care, and some prefer uncircumcised, but I really believe that most women prefer circumcised.
2006-09-05 22:42:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do women think they have a right to mutilate men because they find it prettier? And why is it only American women that think that way? If your husband asked you to cut off part of your clitoris because he didn't like the look of it, would you?
OK - there is NO medical reason to circumcise. It doesn't make the penis cleaner (if the guy doesn't wash anyway, it won't make a difference, and if he washes, it won't be dirty or smelly). It doesn't change the instance of STDs, penile cancer, or any other disease.
The American Medical Association and the American Association of Paediatrics have both said there is no need for this operation on a routine basis.
In terms of preference - circumcised don't have an option, because their parents did this to them when they were children and could not object.
2006-09-01 07:19:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I can't really answer because I'm a woman, but I am very, very grateful that my husband's parents did not mutilate him that way. I want my man whole, the way nature intended! All of the "hygenic" reasons for it are ridiculous - men have had penises for a good long time, with very few of them being cut until the Victorians decided it would keep boys from playing with themselves (it didn't work!), and the human race survived just fine.
Chopping the foreskin off disfigures the organ and cuts down on sensation. It is really and truly one of the most disgusting things anyone could ever do to their baby!
2006-09-02 10:13:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Maple 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i sure as hell don't want to b, but my parents didnt' give me that option, why the hell is it legal to cut a part of someone's body off without permission from that person and it's a perfectly healthy peice of functioning skin. And how could the parents allow someone to put their small child through pain like that. I'm sure that like how woman weren't viewed as poeople and all that went with that, slavery and all kinds of stupid things, this will one day go under that and poeple will wonder why it was done in first place. There's no health reasons for this unless you live somewhere where there's no water but even then it would probalby be just as likely for a woman to get infected cuz she also couldn't clean her privates and our teeth would probaly get infected too
2006-09-01 17:48:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mat 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
PLEASE, specify, is this a personal or a privet preference, is it for show and tell or for a strong belief. Any one can be clipped, but it takes a special person to up hold the true meaning of circumcision.
2006-09-08 22:38:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by jay perez 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
most women prefer the men to be circumsised. Many reason but mainly due to hygiene. typicallyt he foreskin will keep bacteria in it and then when having unprotected sex it will give the woman bacterial infections. Because we all know that men dont go take a shower right before having sex, to clean their penis.
2006-09-09 04:46:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by rrt 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is an indisputable FACT that the foreskin is the most nerve-rich portion of the male anatomy. Uncircumcised men enjoy sex more, and their partners enjoy sex more. One need only read surveys and research into the subject--where the partner had both experienced a cut and uncut penis. You cannot take surveys conducted in the United States, where nearly every boy is mutilated, seriously. THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED AND UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS! They are answersing with question to NO KNOWLEDGE!
Of course the penis feels more sensation when the skin is pulled back. That's what the foreskin is for! To keep the mucous membrane (head of the penis) moist, supple, and sensitive, so that sex is extremely pleasurable. Men who lack a foreskin have enlarged, kerotinized heads, completely devoid of the sensitivity it used to have. Years of being exposed to air and rubbing against clothes dries it out and kills the nerves. The head enlarges because it's been scarred! That larger head on cut guys is scar tissue--nasty, carved out, mutilated, kerotinized leftovers of their manhood.
The idea that the uncut penis masturbates within itself is totally bogus--if a man's penis is 6 inches long and he inserts into his partner, she is receiving 6 inches whether it's covered in foreskin or not. She is receiving that length of pleasure whether the man is gliding in and out of his foreskin or not. The whole notion of "KY JELLY" is something invented in the US, for mutilated men, so they can have sex with their partners, as their dried out penises are incapable of producing their own lube. Sex with an intact man is 100 times better, no ifs ands or buts.
The cleanliness factor is the most abused, overused and stupid reasons for supporting genital mutilation that I have EVER heard. Using that logic, you should CUT OFF YOUR HANDS because they are dirty, or maybe just lop off the entire penis since it's dirty too. Yes, CASTRATE and MUTILATE all dirty body parts, because you know those men, they aren't smart enough to take a shower. You should know who originally fed this load to the American public (80% of the world's men are INTACT!), and consider who the brainwashed harpies are who buy it. It's bogus.
2006-09-07 04:51:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by surfinthedesert 5
·
1⤊
1⤋