Do you think Saddam did really have WMD or was it just for oil?? Pls tell me your views.
serious answers only!!! :-) please!!
2006-09-01 06:02:43 · 17 answers · asked by Crazzzzzy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
US are the perpetrators in the Iraq war. See, the US are the one's that gave weapons to Iraq and were cummy chummy with Saddam at the time. When it suits the US purpose thats when they go and be a hypocrite and pronounce war. If Saddam did have weapons, i'm sure that he wouldnt have hesitated to use them in the Iraq war...i know that i would have. So the question is where are these weapons that Bush and Blair claimed that Saddam had? They have no proof at all and they know that war was bullshit and wasted the taxpayers money on such a bullshit excuse of a war that cost so many of people's lives. There is just no excuse for that. Til this day they dont have any proof and Bush himself said tthat there wasnt any weapons and that war was a waste of time. So, on top of that...they did go for oil too. You see, these people cant stand that the vaste majority of oil supply are Arab controlled. Why buy it, when we can go to war under false pretenses and invade the land and its resources. Just like they invaded the gulf region during the Gulf war, Afganistan, Iraq, next might be Lebanon, Iran or Syria. Who knows. know one in these countries want alien forces there for democracy so they should just leave and fix laundy in their own countries. It's such a shame.
2006-09-01 06:25:35 · answer #1 · answered by mam.cyborg 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dunno - but I DO know that if the Iraqis weaponized the 8,000 liters of anthrax that they acknowledged possessing it would fit into three large suitcases.
In a country the size of Iraq, how hard do you think it would be to hide three large suitcases?
The truth of it is that in some cases (e.g., anthrax) we may NEVER know if they had them (WMDs) at the time of our invasion or if they continue to have them.
It's not a made-for-TV movie, is it? Everything isn't all tidy and understandable even though, as humans, we crave that desperately!
As for oil, we can buy all the oil we want - there's no shortage of cash on our part and no shortage of product from our suppliers (not to say it's especially cheap right now!). The people who raise the issue of oil make it sound as though we invaded Iraq so we could back up our tankers to their oil platforms and just load it on for free. A simple idea from simple minds - nothing more, nothing less.
2006-09-01 06:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
in view that there have been no WMDs, even however Rummy et al claimed to have basic the place they have been placed, then their next trump card develop into terrorism. the fairly some issues the superb will cite are shells that were uncovered to the climate and had a) been degraded and subsequently ineffective or b) were decrease than UN seal which the U. S. infantrymen broke open of their hunt for those "humongous" WMD piles they have been to seek for. project, till we invaded Iraq there develop into no Al Qaeda. If we proceed to apply that premise, while are we going to invade the Sudan, the place Al Qaeda has a meant coaching floor, or Pakistan the place there is extensive help and coaching grounds for Al Qaeda- a now transforming into project because of the fact the protection tension government isn't as sturdy because it develop into earlier, or Indonesia the checklist can bypass on and on. Pre-emptive wars on any u . s . a . is a contravention of the UN shape which the U. S. signed. individually, i do no longer understand if he lied yet while he did no longer then he develop into an entire ignoramus and stupid and did no longer worry to ascertain what develop into rather occurring and why the thumbscrews have been utilized by Cheney, Wolfie, Rummy etc on the push to warfare. If he did no longer lie, he did no longer elect to renowned the reality and did no longer elect to ask the complicated questions- a ailment it relatively is working rampant interior the Republican social gathering, regrettably
2016-12-11 19:04:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were frightened into believing that Iraq had weapons of mass distruction that could harm us. None have been found and lets face it for a country that everyone was afraid of they didn't put up much resistance. The situation in iraq is now out of control. I know a lot of people will disagree but they were better off before they got invaded.
2006-09-01 09:31:18 · answer #4 · answered by Cowboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you seriously believe that Saddam didn't have WMDs? of course he did. He killed innocent people in his own country because their views differed from his. Almost everybody in Congress believed along with the President that there were WMDs. But that information happened to be bad. They did find some chemical weapons though.
And a part of the reason we went to war was for oil. We need oil. Why not go to war for what practically almost every American needs?
2006-09-01 06:07:42 · answer #5 · answered by Mags 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, I think one plausible idea is that Saddam was tricked into thinking he had WMD when actually his scientists were still working hard to develop them. He then waved his imaginary WMD around until the threat seemed too serious to ignore.
2006-09-01 06:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
most likely for oil but saddam was a pretty ruthles person and the wmd are all in uk, them coupled with tony blair selling our country up the swanee what is going on , learn to build a bomb and have a free home in england.
2006-09-02 03:36:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mainstream media says Saddam didn't have WMDs and it was just an excuse for the U.S. to go to war with Iraq, but I trust the words of my colleagues who wear the uniform, have done tours in Iraq, and have seen them with their own eyes -- believe me, my friend, he had them.
P.S.: If you're going to watch that yellow journalism rag of a movie titled "Fahrenheit 9/11" be sure to watch "Fahrenhype 9/11" which shows just how much of Michael Moore's Bush-bashing move was made up of out-and-out lies.
2006-09-01 06:09:19 · answer #8 · answered by sarge927 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he had them....and by the way, the U.S. gave him the weapons in question back in Iraq's war with Iran...actually U.S. also provided Iran with weapons for the same war. Talk about hypocrisy!
but the Iraq invasion was for oil. The weapons were a sorry excuse.
2006-09-01 06:09:29 · answer #9 · answered by Navid V 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I agree with cowboy, the Iraqi's are worse off now than what they where before. Once again George and Tony have put the kiss of death on whatever they touch.
2006-09-01 10:06:25 · answer #10 · answered by button mushroom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋