I would like to know if anyone on the planet thinks it a bit ludicrous that this so called God engenedered intimay procreation and offspring coming from the instruments of urination. If you do, give me specific reasons for your conclusion and if you don't please explain that with cogent reasons as well
2006-09-01 06:00:16 · 15 answers · asked by Steven S 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
That, and nipples on men, and appendixes on the human large intestine, make me wonder whether humans might have evolved without a divine guiding hand.
It's NOT aesthetic! One answerer proposed that justaposing the urinary equipment with the reproductive equipment revealed a divine efficiency and harmony. HA! Since when does one leave his most valuable things (children) in the sewer? No, indeed. The asker had it right: this isn't harmony, but irony.
2006-09-01 07:09:43 · answer #1 · answered by David S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's no relationship between barbarism and the theorized "design" of animal beings. The ideas are diametrically opposed. And the proximity of the ducts for urination and ejaculation have no significance outside of a purely visceral one. So offering a "cogent reason," is not only impossible but it gives undue credit to the validity of the question. Nice try though. Try asking: What can oppose God's Will," and when they say "Nothing" then ask how Satan can exist. But they have an answer for everything, so just stop asking and accept that you know and they pray and try to coexist unless you live in Mississippi, in which case, MOVE!
2006-09-01 13:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a non-question. The question itself cannot be answered properly because you're linking too many unrelated factors. God is a religious factor. Intimacy is a human cultural and psychological factor. Reproduction and urination are biological factors. Your "questioning" of barbarism or not and ludicrousness are human cultural ethically relativistic judgments. It's all like asking if worms get happy about my opinion about the dark side of the moon in June. None of it has anything to do with anything else thus no answer would have any meaning or relevance.
Biology goes for what's easiest and what works. Sexual reproduction and genetic variation was an evolutionary adaptation to keep higher organisms genetically viable against microbial infections that reproduced much faster and could easily adapt and overcome slower reproducing organisms (yeah, like people) so sexual reproduction was adapted to keep the gene pool constantly but ever so slightly varied. Kinda like on Star Trek (Don't say it. I know) when they have to adjust the frequency of their phasers to keep ahead of Shields that constantly modulate frequencies.
The same way we use our throats to swallow food, vomit infectious materials out of our upper digestive tract and breath, we use our lower plumbing for multiple tasks also. Efficient without having to add more parts.
I think your question speeks more to your personal anal retentive and germo phobic feelings about sex and your dissappointment with and attempt to embarrass God.
I caution you to contemplate that you may not be as intelligent as you seem to think you are.
2006-09-01 13:42:27 · answer #3 · answered by Captain Obvious 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sperm does not travel through the uretha where urine travels. Sperm travels through the vans deferns, an organ exclusively for reproduction. As is the testicles, no urine in there! And its is medically impossible, genetic deformities not included, for a male to urinate when he is ejaculating.
The uterus and ovaries have nothing to do with urination either, those are exclusively reproduction.
I don't know a bout you but I'm completely happy with what I have. I don't think i would enjoy having lots of different openings to excrete waste and reproduce on my body.
2006-09-01 13:08:02 · answer #4 · answered by MMTS 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sound completely genius...after all how very efficient it is to have just one tool in which to accomplish both, urination, cleansing the body of toxins, and then the means of passage for the Gods creations to enter the material existence.
Alleluia
2006-09-01 13:05:20 · answer #5 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My penis is a sexual organ, an object of beauty (to some), an object of humour (to some), a device to urinate through, and a definite identifier of my gender. It's ingenius, I'm suprized Victorinox hasn't patented the thing yet!
2006-09-01 13:09:55 · answer #6 · answered by Alobar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's all about the apple and Eve. If you actually read the bible you would know the answer to the reason as to why women have children and why it is done the way it is. Where else would you think it would come out of the body
2006-09-01 13:05:40 · answer #7 · answered by JUNONNKI 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, she is an engineer. She thinks in utilitarian terms; that is, whatever is the handiest. What other part of the body would you suggest for the task of reproduction? We should have a poll! Interesting question.
2006-09-01 13:05:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe you are to full of **** to really see, what the *** does it really matter. I would suspect you use your instrument only for urination and nothing more, something tells me you really haven't had any type of intimacy at least with a girl.
2006-09-01 16:44:02 · answer #9 · answered by The Pooh-Stick Kid 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd like to beat you to death with a sack of potatoes sir. Would that make me a barbarian?
...or just an Irishman?
2006-09-01 13:03:06 · answer #10 · answered by Ricky Roma 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋