English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't, we're fools if we believe that garbage.

2006-09-01 05:56:24 · 20 answers · asked by anitahooker_transvestite 2 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Fight who here, the Iraqis? Never heard of them trying to come here, hell the "terrorists are all over the world, let's send troops to every country in the world, that would leave America empty and who's gonna defend it? Shoot I'm confused, gotta go take some oxycottin.

2006-09-01 05:58:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I couldn't disagree more. There is no such thing as a terrorist nation. Terrorists are small groups of extremists not affiliated with any government. If there were any terrorists in Iraq, they left like rats deserting a sinking ship before the first bombs fell. They have no loyalty to Iraq. If we tried to fight the war on terror by going to war with every country that has ever given birth to a terrorist, we would be at war with everyone, including ourselves (remember Timothy McVeigh?)

2006-09-01 06:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 0 0

That's the way it's always been. Pick up a history book sometime, some of them even have pictures to hold the interest of really stupid people.
Do you understand what the phrase means? What is there to agree with?
What the author of that statement is trying to convey is: if we need to do battle, do it on his turf, we don't need to be fighting wars on our own turf. And, God help the poor, dumb bastards who think they can bring a war to our shores, they will most assuredly, be annihilated!

2006-09-01 06:04:23 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0 0

I agree with jamie. Let's send troops to every country, and show everyone who's number 1. We can destroy North Kprea, the entire middle east, then on the way home let's remind France that we saved them from being destroyed and we can revoke that at any time.

2006-09-01 06:05:23 · answer #4 · answered by ihatehippies 3 · 0 0

Yes I do. No it wasn't Iraqi's that came over here but then it's not iraqis we are trying to kill in Iraq. We are over there fighting the insurgents. You think you guys would get this figured out after all this time.

2006-09-01 06:06:17 · answer #5 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0 0

I asked the same question last night.

The only reason for fighting them "over there" are to save the chicken sh*its over here that think it's better to sacrifice someone elses life, instead of their own. Americans are dying and getting perminently wounded regardless of where we fight them ... because we are STILL FIGHTING! Where the hell is DIPLOMACY?

2006-09-01 06:01:10 · answer #6 · answered by pickle head 6 · 2 0

No. It's an excuse to lead us into war so the government spending can keep out economy growing at the expense of human life. Isolationism and internal policing of our citizens and immigrants are the only way to effectively reduce the threat of terrorism.

2006-09-01 05:59:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes, but we are not doing that. We are bogged down in a Civil War in Iraq instead of hunting down the real terrorists.

2006-09-01 05:59:21 · answer #8 · answered by courage 6 · 1 1

Yes. Why the hell would you like to bring a war over into the United States where you live?

2006-09-01 05:57:51 · answer #9 · answered by Mags 3 · 2 1

I agree, provided that we realize that Iraqis were NOT coming here if we failed to invade Iraq. Not at all!

It's SAUDIS who did 9/11. Why aren't we invading Saudi Arabia, then?

2006-09-01 05:58:42 · answer #10 · answered by kreevich 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers