English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He preceeds this speculation with discussion of Democrat confidence that they will win in 06.

"you juxtapose this [movie where Bush is assassinated] with all of the ********* that the Democrats have that they're going to win, and they're just insane."

Is he hinting the Democrats would like to kill Bush,as a way of taking the election? He clearly says they are "insane" to think they can win an election.

Then he speculates that moveon.org will sponsor this movie, and demand that elected officals go to the premiere.

The film has nothing to do with US Democrats, it's British. I'm no defender of moveon.org, but do you agree that these connections are preposterous?

I listen to and read Rush because he's important - many say he speaks the truth.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_083106/content/america_s_anchorman.guest.html

2006-09-01 05:42:41 · 24 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

24 answers

I heard about it, it is a British movie and has no connection to Democrats but that's the Republican way of spinning thing around to fool the thoughtless sheep.

2006-09-01 05:46:01 · answer #1 · answered by Enterrador 2 · 5 2

A president can purely get stuff executed if their party controls the two chambers of Congress. Obama has virtually no ability top now, he lost the homestead in 2011. He purely had complete ability for 2 years. Bush, on the different hand, had complete ability for 6 years, he did no longer lose Congress till 2007 (while the Democrats gained the two chambers). because of the fact of this Bush is a lot worse than Obama and all of us comprehend it. He had six years to wreck united statesa.. i do no longer think of Obama destroyed something, yet regardless of in case you do, he purely had 2 years of it.

2016-11-06 05:34:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

well, based on this:

"I think, as I've said before, they actually believe that their animus and sheer, unbridled, totally focused hatred of George W. Bush is shared by a majority of Americans. "This is the dramatic moment, when President Bush is gunned down by a sniper after a public address at a hotel, in a gripping new docudrama soon to be aired on TV. Set around October of 2007, President Bush is assassinated as he leaves the Sheraton hotel in Chicago." Whatever happened to the notion that if you talked about this, threatened to do this, or what have you, the Secret Service was knocking on your door inside of ten seconds?"

i'd say he is confused about the nature of free speech. i have no idea how someone could believe a movie about an assassination about a real figure could be considered a threat. it's not a very good conspiracy, nor would it bode well for our country if the ss as he calls them can be at your door within 10 seconds of writing a screenplay.

poor rush. he has no idea that his right to demonize clinton, that he got so much mileage out of, is exactly the same as these people's right to make a movie about assassinating bush.

2006-09-01 05:49:25 · answer #3 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 1 2

I remember Rush chuckling during the Clinton administration about people applauding when the White House was blown up in the movie Independence Day, so who really cares what the limp dicked, drug addicted, hypocrite thinks. He needs to take a big dose of his Viagra and F himself.

2006-09-01 06:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by colliebygolly 2 · 2 0

There has already been a book written about assassinating Pres. Bush. It was discussed during the last election.

2006-09-01 06:01:46 · answer #5 · answered by MD office worker 1 · 0 0

Rush, fly to Dominican republic, take some oxy's drink some rum take a couple of viagras have sex with a couple of underage Dominican girls, and get off the airwaves, I don't know how anybody can still listen to this drugadict and think that he makes any kind of sense, they must be on drugs too.

2006-09-01 06:01:14 · answer #6 · answered by elnavajo 2 · 3 0

I'm a liberal democrat who despises bush....but i don't think liberals including myself would support assissination of the president.

Rush is just doing what Rush does best. Stirring up the hornets nest. I like the truth he speaks...about how drug users should be thrown into prison.

2006-09-01 05:48:14 · answer #7 · answered by Franklin 7 · 3 0

Rush Limbaugh says a lot of things.

I don't support Bush, but I also think this movie is in incredibly bad taste and should not have ever been made.

2006-09-01 05:49:03 · answer #8 · answered by Brian L 7 · 3 0

I heard these comments from him as well. I don't think that he believes Democrats would support the assination of Bush, but if you look at the recent history of Democrat actions --- they have aligned themselves with the ultra-extreme left people and organizations such as Michael Moore and move-on.org. It would seem reasonable to assume that they would support this as a right to free speech.

2006-09-01 05:47:09 · answer #9 · answered by OatesATM 3 · 2 1

WOW! I think the coke is talkin'!
I take that back; the viagra has gone to Rush's head!
Assassinating Bush would make me, a liberal, happy? Gosh...I don't think so.
I'm not in favor of anybody assassinating Bush!
Why?!
He deserves to live a long, long time and suffer...for all of the US soldiers who have died in 'his' war!

2006-09-01 05:51:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers