Liberals aren't cowards, republicans just like to spin everything. They would have you a piece of crap and tell you it's black gold. Then they'd have Fox news do a story on it and next thing you know it's in office for 8 years.
2006-09-01 05:21:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by nickels 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
When we were children, everything was black and white. Bullies were bad, recess was good. Falling out of a tree was bad, being able to go "no-hands" on your bike was good.
Most of us, as we reach adulthood, realize that everything is no longer in black and white. Sometimes you can walk away from a fight...other times you cannot.
Sometimes words can prevent a person from bombing a building; but other times you just need a bigger gun.
This is the sad, degenerate state our world is in.
I don't believe that liberals are cowards...because there are some liberals who LOVE to pick fights.
However, sometimes pacifists are wrong. Sometimes we NEED to take more aggressive action. Look at history. Did we have another option out of WWII?
Look at now. Will the terrorists stop attacking us, if we just "talk" to them? No, they'll behead a pacifist just as fast as they would a soldier. That's just the way it is.
That's the gray area. It's sad, isn't it?
It makes me want to go back to being a child.
2006-09-01 05:20:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
you're absolutely right, what has war ever solved besides Genocide, Slavery, Opression, Communism, Fascist Regimes, Despotism, Human Rights violations, the Holocaust, and Terrorism? We don't need war, i mean im sure the terrorists will bargain with us, all we have to do is die, thats not that big of an inconvienence is it? Liberals are cowards because there are timeds when war is necassary, liberals dont even want to go to war then. We could not let Adlolf Hitler conquer Europe, because then he would have conquered us. But you're right, im sure he would have negotiated out of it, i mean Neville Chamberlains negotiations worked so well.
2006-09-01 05:14:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
That only works when there is somebody to "protect you." In the rest of the world, that's a good way to get killed. Running away gets you a bullet in the back. In the 90s, general butt naked killed over 1,000 people, including his body guards, with a machete in Africa completely naked. Just one guy with a gun would have taken him down.
2006-09-01 05:26:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by gregory_dittman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you teach your children that it is wrong to defend themselves,that is your problem.My children don't run around and pick fights,but if attacked by a bully, they know how,and are encouraged, to defend themselves.It is the liberals who are teaching the" run for your life" mentality,not conservatives.
2006-09-01 05:29:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely passive behavior goes against the laws of nature! I say kick A$$ take no prisoners!
2006-09-01 05:18:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by bulabate 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I tell my son if a bully hits him to hit him back. I'm not even Republican.
2006-09-01 05:15:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
but how many times do you let that bully beat your brains in! there has to come a time to stand on your own two feet and defend yourself and that which is yours!!!
2006-09-01 05:17:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
this is contradicting statement
2006-09-01 05:17:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by james w 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
good point!
2006-09-01 05:19:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by RACHEL 2
·
0⤊
1⤋