sorry brothers..even though you deny me, its going to happen as i said.
2006-09-01 04:51:50 · 6 answers · asked by arthi t 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I WONT DENY YOU DEAR.
HAIR IS COMPLAINED FOR RACISM.
HIS PAST ACTIVITIES CONFIRM THAT.
BUT IN TAMPERING ISSUE, HE OPERATED AS PER LAW.
STILL I FEEL HE COULD BE MILD ON THIS ISSUES.
HE SHOULD HAVE GIVEN A WARNING TO END ALL THIS.
HE DID USE HIS ENTIRE POWER IN THIS TAMPERING ISSUE.
THATS NOT FAIR.
BUT, WE CANT BLAME HIM.
COZ, HE DID EVERYTHING UNDER THE RULES.
IF ICC BREACH THE CONTRACT, HE SHOULD BE PAID WITH HALF A BILLION $.
HE DENOTED THIS POINT IN HIS MAIL.
SO, ICC WILL NOT BE PREPARED TO GIVE-UP SUCH A BIG AMOUNT.
AND ICC WILL TRY TO PROLONG THIS ENQUIRY PERIOD TO REDUCE THE TENSION.
HAIR IS A CULPRIT. BUT ITS VERY HARD TO PROVE AGAINST HIM.
PAK. ARE NOT SO OFFENSIVE. BUT ITS TOO TOUGH TO ADMIT.THIS IS ICC'S CURRENT STATE.
2006-09-01 23:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Hair goes, my only wish is that he does so with an unblemished reputation. He will be remembered as a tough and fearless umpire and not as a racist, as has been doing the rounds. As far as ICC asking him to leave, well , the question does not really arise as he has opted to leave on certain terms.
2006-09-01 20:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by slender 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is this seen as a racist issue (see above responses)?
Darryl Hair has stood as a lonely figure, as a pillar for the laws of cricket. He has had the courage and integrity to speak up when he saw the rules being breached (chucking, tampering) and has been vilified for it.
His motives have been questioned, as corrupt and/or racist.
Who, in their right mind, would go into umpiring, and where would our beloved game be without them?
How much damage has been done to cricket, by the critics of Darryl Hair, and those who seek to break or pervert the laws of the game?
2006-09-02 05:51:58 · answer #3 · answered by bonesetter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Hair is gone by the time you resolve this question. ICC is making him a scapegoat. Hair has himself to blame for asking the money in lieu of resigning.
Odds are against him.
2006-09-01 23:41:55 · answer #4 · answered by Freddie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
youre right
2006-09-01 13:27:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you are right
2006-09-01 05:13:47 · answer #6 · answered by A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋