When will paranoid idiot Rightist srealize that the Iraq War has nOTHING to do with terrorism?

Question

NOTHING WEHATSOEVER!

Iraq did NOT attack us on 9/11.

Saddam, a secular Baathist, did NOT have a working relationship with Al Qaeda. They consider him an infidel.

We face a bigger threat from Iran. But we're using "diplomatic means" there! How pussified!

When will you LEARN?

I can't even criticize the clear fiasco that is Iraq without you idiots accusing me of weakening our fight against terrorists. Iraq has NOTHING to do with that.

No, we did NOT find chemical weapons! We found dried-out, inert residues that would harm no one.

NO, al-Qaeda did NOT train in Iraq. They trained in Afghanistan. (A proper use of war.) AND here in the good old US of A!

NO, Iraq did NOT fund al-Qaeda! Saddam would OT help them. "The ememy of my emeny" is conjecture, nto factual evidence!

"Funding some terrorist organization" (charity to the families of suicide bombers agaisnt ISRAEL) is NOT a proper cause for us to go to war.

NO, Iraqis were NOT going to come here if we failed to invade.

Answer 1

the poster is right.But now we have NEW terrorist to deal with,all those In Iraq.They want us out, people,Over half of Americans want us out too.wtf?Bushs'war actually supports more terrorism making us less safe! we needed to spend that 311 BILLION (and counting)on fighting the terrorists that DID attack us,and making us safer by inspecting cargo entering the states,tightening the borders,and protecting potential targets.two month count down until we VOTE the Mo fo war mongers OUT OF OFFICE!!!

Answer 2

Well Sadaam was funding some terrorist organizations and was an openly America hater. That is why US invaded him, Us had to start somwhere to teach a leesson to the Islamic world. And it's better to fight those Islamists, mullahs, radicals, what not in Iraq and neighbourhood. Keep them involved in that region. Look at the neighbourhood, Saudi , Syria and Iran are neighbours and you know these countries are ruled by dictators and mullahs. And that region is too important for this world to just leave and let those kind of rulers take control--means the terrorists get free control. So America should stay in that region for ever, I guess because sooner or later those countries I mentioned in theat area would have to be confronted.
Its better to get used to the terrain and be ready with all intelligence to strike when we are ready and the time is ripe.
You got to understand one thing clear it is not about Iraq or Iran, America and Bush and all like minded countries have realized that this religion has become a serious problem and that has to be fought and it is easier to do being there.

Answer 3

well considering we only ivestigated iraq's ties to 9/11, we didnt say he actually was involved. Also, have you ever heard "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Al queda would have taken anything from saddam if it meant they could attack america with it. We went to war because saddam was building up a weapons stockpile. Nuclear weapons are not the only WMD in the world. Anthrax, Mustard gas, and other chemical weapons are also considered WMD's by international standards, yet the media has tried to convince us that Nuclear weapons are the only wmd's. We did find all those chemical weapons. I have a question for you though "When will all you left wing radical dumbasses realize that just because you didnt vote for him, doesnt mean he isnt your president, and for that you should still respect him."

Answer 4

to a pair quantity, definite. My husband works the Chicago Marathon each and every twelve months, and he commented final night that if he'd been doing the comparable interest in Boston, he could have been suitable interior the location of the explosions. of direction this introduced abode the certainty of the attack in a fashion not something could have, and this is made me nervous concerning to the possibility of a copycat attack in October, while the Chicago Marathon would be run. apart from, I as quickly as referred to as Boston abode and be responsive to the section the place the explosions got here approximately particularly nicely. I lived interior of reach and used to pass out to cheer on the Marathon runners each and every Patriots' Day. That, too, made the form greater real to me. in spite of the shown fact that, I knew somebody who died on 9/11, and as undesirable as this tragedy is, it pales in assessment, although not, I understand, for the family of the lifeless and heavily wounded. to boot, my instincts are telling me that this grew to become into not an attack via foreign places terrorists yet extremely the artwork of a homegrown nutcase. That by some skill places a distinctive complexion on the project, although of direction i could desire to be fullyyt incorrect.

Answer 5

Osama attacked America and America attacked Saddam. I have no sympathies for that man but he had good qualities too, hew was a liberal, secular man, the kind of freedom women enjoyed under his rule cannot be found anywhere else in the Middle East.

Answer 6

Iraq not only let AL queada train on its soil, but gave them funding. no Iraqis were actually in those planes on 9/11, they just learned how to perform the hijacking in Iraqi-sponsored summer camps.

Answer 7

I agree completely with republicanattacksquad.

Answer 8

Not going to happen. It's like trying to convince someome that God (or elves) doesn't exist. If they already agree with you, then you're wasting your time. If they don't, you're wasting your breath.

Answer 9

I get it.Thanks for the info.

Answer 10

who knos