Is it a valid to compare the threat of Germany under Hitler with the current day threat from radical muslims?

Answer 1

Absolutely not! Hitler did what he did out of pure hatred for others not like him or his distorted view of perfection. He viewed himself as doing mankind a 'favor' by cleaning up the world to his liking. The radical muslims believe what they are doing is driven by ideology and are willing to sacrifice themselves - their physical body to defend their ideology. True, both were driven by hatred of others and both are 'striking out' against others without provocation in some instances. Globalization is threatening their culture and they appear to need someone to blame - which could be the greatest decline for their dedicated, loyal, loving Muslim brothers/sisters. They may be winning battles but they are not winning any loyalty worldwide and history tells us that the bloodshed will come back to haunt their progeny.

Answer 2

Fascism is fascism. Whether it be from an atheist or a mullah. Fascism is fascism. The following is from Wikipedia.

Fascism is a radical totalitarian political philosophy that combines elements of corporatism, authoritarianism, extreme nationalism, militarism, anti-anarchism, anti-communism and anti-liberalism.

The original fascist (fascismo) movement ruled Italy from 1922 to 1943 under the leadership of Benito Mussolini. In time, the generic term fascism came to cover a class of authoritarian political ideologies, parties, and political systems. The most notable of these parties are the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP) under Adolf Hitler but also Hungary's Arrow Cross Party, Romania's Iron Guard, Spain's Falange and the French political movements led by former socialists Marcel Déat and Jacques Doriot and others. Some authors reject this broader use of the term or exclude certain of these parties and regimes.

Answer 3

dude the way i c it the Muslims are just trying to get out of western pressures and want nothing to do with the west. As a result of western harassment's as well as Israel the decide to use Jews as a scapegoat. so the radical Muslims would not be radical if it were not from western pressures. why would they? im sure their people just like me and you. Hitle was just a maniac who killed Jews without reason, the Jews never did anything to him. but the Jews did hurt many Muslims so that's y they are that way they are retaliating. the media however, wants to make it look like the Muslims are the bad guys, and its working. so if there is anyone to blame its bush. i think in the Back of everyone mind we know that there is something that bush is covering up such as trying to gain control of resources in the middle east. watch BBC its so much truer than CNN and i t actually shows both sides of the war. not only the scary Muslims training and trying to create a sense of hatred towards Muslims. think that's what the media wants without saying it openly

Answer 4

Hmmm difficult question. on the one hand Hitler invaded the whole of europe and parts of north Africa, he exterminated 6 million jews, he cohorted Japan into invading Asia. His actions directly caused the deaths of over sixty million people. Radical Muslims have brought down the twin towers, attacked the USS Cole bombed turkey, britain, barley, Madrid, and a french oil tanker, In short No it is not valid

Answer 5

No, one was a country, the other is a military or political strategy!

You are also talking about Radical Muslim's who America pi-sed off! Not the majority of Muslims!

Scuba diver, you forgot America! We are run by a bunch of fascists!

Answer 6

Absolutely.
In Nazi Germany, there was a bent to prove the superiority of one system above another, which is exactly what radical Islam is telling their people.
The difference is the Nazis wore uniforms and did not hide behind women and children.
A similarity is that they both used the media to portray their side as victims and gain sympathy from the world.

Himmler and Hizb'allah...joined at the lip.

Answer 7

Yes it is. When a certain person wants to annihilate a group of citizens of this world they are the same. I have quickly read other answers and they apparently have no knowledge of Hitler or his threats. I hope these same people will choose to get educated.

Answer 8

Ideologically, a better comparison would be with that of the fascist party under Benito Mussolini, but with an Islamic theocracy.

Answer 9

no its not valid hitler's nazis were centralized in one territory while there are radical muslims all over the world. you need to compare hitler to bush

Answer 10

Hitler was only a Baby compared.
Take care!