How many NUKES will be dropped on Iran?

Question

DEROLICTOCRAPPPPPS

Answer 1

An Israeli sub can get close enough to launch a few cruise missles at their identified nuke facilities and keep setting them back. But nothing will stop them from doing it. This is an act of defiance and pride.

Nukes won't be used against them. Conventional weapons perhaps, and I doubt the US will be involved. The UN won't take action against them since four countries with veto power on the security council are helping Iran to build the program.

Besides why should we care about enforcing a UN directive... we know the UN is all BS full of corrupt politicians with hidden agendas. Why should Iran listen to them if no one else will?

Answer 2

It would depend on who does it, if anyone.

The USA will not drop any Nukes on Iran in the foreseeable future. Things would have to deteriorate quite badly for the USA to use other weapons, but it would not be nuclear, not even that imaginary neutron bomb.

But the USA is allowing Iran to increase in power to offset the potential unification of the Sunni, much like the old Sino-Soviet card was used in the Cold War. MinIntel stll runs Iran, they just changed their name after they allowed Shah to be deposed.

Pakistan may drop 4 to 6 along the Zagros mountains. Pakistan is the most unpredictable, but they may attempt to unify Sunni Islam with Pakistan as the authority.

Russia might, under the proper circumstances. They will not allow any further diminution of their relative power, and Islam has been at war with them for many years. They too wish to strengthen Iran to offset their own Sunni, and Wahabbi(Kazan, Tatarstan) problems. It would take extraordinary predicate actions for Russia to bomb Iran with nuclear weapons, or else they would have already had a nuclear accident in Chechnya or Dagestan.

There is a very, very low probability that any nuclear weapons will be used on a first-strike on Iran.

Answer 3

The underground Natanz research facility where the uranium will be enriched must be destroyed by bunker buster bombs like ammonium nitrate mixed with fuel oil. The nuclear power plant at Bushehr could also be destroyed with conventional weapons as well as the Arak heavy water facility. It is not even necessary to use nuclear weapons to take out Iran's nuclear capabilities.

Answer 4

The big problem is most Persians look like normal white people.

How do you justify killing all of them?? I could understand if they were dark skinned rag heads but they are people like Andre Agassai and Kathryn McPhee from American Idol.

Sure I know most white people would love to Nuke me. But can you Nuke another white person?

Go big Red Go

Answer 5

I sincerely hope - NONE! If nuclear weapons are used, then Bush needs his head seeing to (but we knew that, anyway).

Let's see now, Hitler wanted the Germanic race to be supreme. At least he was relatively honest about that goal ...

Answer 6

TRy none! Radio-active oil is useless! This is the mentality that you can handle - when you get tired of playing here go back to your video games.

Answer 7

I say sneak into one of their nuclear weapons facility set of a bomb.....and then say it was a malfunction when Iran is wiped of the face of the earth.

Answer 8

Enough that the comparison between USA and Nazi Germany will be complete. And in the end, the USA will have murdered more civilians.

Answer 9

None

There too many whiny idiots intent on the demise of this country.

Just look around this forum.

Answer 10

As many as necessary I hope the MF suffer as well
Take care!