should it be a age differance
2006-09-01 04:30:01 · 10 answers · asked by Da..KINGizHeRe!! 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I don't know that age is the most important factor. I think money, and a persons ability to raise all their children are more important. Maturity is important too. There is too much abuse due to the inability to cope with the challenges of childrearing. I think where age factors in , is when a person has children in their 50's or 60's and wouldn't be there to raise and enjoy there kids.
2006-09-01 04:38:57 · answer #1 · answered by busymama 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't have them if you can't afford them financially or emotionally, There are too many children being born into these situations and that doesn't give the kids a fair chance in the world. Mandatory sterilization of people receiving public assistance might be a bit much but there has to be a happy median. CONDOMS ARE CHEAPER THAN KIDS.
2006-09-01 04:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by bullybrian2000 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As long as you can afford them and take care of them and love them then everyone has to decide that for thenselves. My husband and I have 7 children and they are very close in age......15, 15, 14, 13, 12, 10, and 10.
2006-09-01 04:38:37 · answer #3 · answered by ♥Stacy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boy there is no limits. At least that's what I think. Make all the kids you want as long as you can support them and give them what they need.
2006-09-01 04:37:57 · answer #4 · answered by Sade 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, I am not sure of your question, but here goes. I believe you should replace yourselves. In other words, have two kids. One for you and one for your partner. Do I look at people with more than two children in a poor light. No...but I do believe you need to be financially responsible and parentally responsible for all of the children you bare. For instance, my neighbor has 5 children. They live in a nice neighborhood and obviously make enough money to care for their children. However, her kids are always running around in the street with no sense of danger...they are always causing trouble because their parents are not home to discipline them and they are always at one house or another to borrow items to complete their dinner (can we borrow a cup of milk, or a cup of sugar...or whatever).
2006-09-01 04:39:14 · answer #5 · answered by sewshawn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My limit is two but your limit should be as many as you want and can take care. If you can take care of the limit you want then just don't have any.
2006-09-01 04:37:48 · answer #6 · answered by Ludacris Lover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have 3 kids each one two and a half years apart my oldest is 6 youngest is 1 and thats enough!!!
2006-09-01 04:39:09 · answer #7 · answered by lkk_04_04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
huh? you mean should you not be able to have kids at a certain time, even if you can? Or that you can only have a certain number of kids? Well the answer to both is no.
2006-09-01 04:34:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you should only have the right amount of kids according to your salary so that you can afford to raise them.
age differnce should be like 3 years or 2
2006-09-01 04:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finances. Nothing in this world is worth living in poverty over.
2006-09-01 04:33:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋