A simple removal from power ought to be sufficient, IMO.
2006-09-01 03:08:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
As time goes on and militant Muslims continue to attack the West and everybody (including you) realizes that this is a fight for survival of all western civilization and not of our choosing, you will realize that Tony Blair was a truly courageous, clear-headed statesman, not just another poll-pleasing politician. Same for W.
You Neville Chamberlins have your head stuffed in a hole. You'll see. Someday. (probably sooner than later)
2006-09-01 10:14:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, I'm not a Brit, but the only thing I see bad in Tony Blair is he's gullible and makes the mistake of listening to Bush
2006-09-05 03:39:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by watcher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were to agree ,would you take John Howard and George Bush with him
2006-09-01 10:09:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by witchfromoz2003 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then he should be set on fire.
Then he should be stomped in to ash.
Then rats with scurvy should urinate on the ashes.
Then he should be reincarnated and we can start all over again!
2006-09-01 10:12:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are you exposing your ignorance to everyone on the Internet?
2006-09-01 10:12:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by festus_porkchop 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of the violent, ignorant, repressed, unthinking, idle, non-participating critics such as....you.
2006-09-01 10:08:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by grapeshenry 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
What about a public caning?
2006-09-01 10:08:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
don't follow english politics very close, mate. now bush on the other hand...
2006-09-01 10:11:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by bizarrorigo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are your reasons and justifications, besides blind fury?
2006-09-01 10:10:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Answers1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋