Should Kimi Raikkonen stay at Mc Laren or go to Ferrari and why? Anything anyone can offer besides unreliabilty? And if Michael Schumacher stays at Ferrari should Kimi go and play second fiddle or stay and have it out equally with Fernando?
2006-09-01 02:20:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Auto Racing
Beggars can't be choosers....not that Kimi is a beggar-type, but hey, it's FERRARI we're talking about. Who DOESN'T want to drive for Ferrari? It's an opportunity you can't miss if you're given it. Was Felipe unhappy to go to Ferrari? Was Rubens? If YOU were an F1 driver, wouldn't you want to go to Ferrari? I don't think Kimi cares if Michael is there or not. If he is, then, as Massa said, you have the chance to measure up against the all time great. No 2 status? All you gotta do is to slow down on the last lap to let Michael pass, or do a really slow outlap while Schumi is in the pit. EVERYONE will know then that you're the faster driver. Unlike Rubens who had to put up with Schumi for so long, Schumi's days are numbered. 2007 can be Kimi's "apprentice" year, then he can go on and win the title in 2008. He's still young.
2006-09-01 16:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by rockpool248 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kimi needs to get away from wherever Alonso goes, and it's obvious that McLaren has no respect for him anymore.
If a relative newbie like Massa can win, then Ferrari has the best cars in F1. Schumacher is old, and has had his time in the sun; he's not as good of a driver as he once was, and Ferrari is the only thing keeping him in the running.
Kimi needs to go to Ferrari, Michael will take another season to figure out he's done, and it should be Kimi and Felipe as one-two. I'd really like to see Kimi in a better car with a team that supports his talent better than McLaren.
2006-09-01 12:12:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The rumour is that he has signed a renault & ferrari contract next year, one is dependant on Schumacher retiring (ferrari), and the other is dependant on Schumacher staying (renault). Either would be better than Mclaren, but i would prefer to see how he would match up to Schumacher in the same car
2006-09-01 02:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by bohbag2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Schumi stays next year, he might not like Kimi to sign up for Ferrari coz it will be obvious he can't get championship against Kimi with both riding the same car. Kimi will easily outpace schumi.
If Kimi goes to Renault, schumi will be ok, but still it will not be easy for schumi to race against him.
If schumi likes it or not, its better for kimi to go to Ferrari. If schumi retires, there is no one to fill the void left by him.
2006-09-01 03:37:27 · answer #4 · answered by sskr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is almost sure to have signed for Ferrari, and staying at McLaren was not an option. Plus he wouldn't like to be the teammate of his 2005 rival.
2006-09-01 05:01:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at this report
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns17367.html
As I've said before, I'd like to see Kimi and Michael together but I think I've got more chance of becoming King of England ( and I'm not even English!).P.S. Hi Adi 06 !
2006-09-01 04:06:54 · answer #6 · answered by ezc692 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kimi should stay at Mc. because he knows the environment there better and in same time he will know how realy fast he is, because his tim mate will be Alonso wich i think will have equal status with him.
2006-09-01 05:03:53 · answer #7 · answered by s_mehmeti 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kimi needs to stay y try to b second best
2006-09-01 02:49:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
numerous issues, fairly. yet on a grand scope.. negativity, fairly. i'm very decrease and dry with unfavourable impacts. i supply no capability to something unfavourable. existence's too short.
2016-11-06 05:18:50 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither... renault
2006-09-01 02:42:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋