-normal people know they were passed unethically
2006-08-31 23:07:19 · 15 answers · asked by A REAL American 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
-havent you just had enough America!!!!!
2006-08-31 23:09:30 · update #1
Kid, you may not know this, but American soldiers gave their lives to protect our rights. Generations of Americans - and others - have fought for them. Your casual Talibanism dishonors this country, and all of those who have fought to protect it. Get the hell out, and take your little right-wing talk-radio traitor buddies with you. You don't deserve to live here.
2006-09-01 03:42:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They should have equal rights, with two exceptions. 1.Gay adoption. Since they can't make a baby in nature, why should they have the right to adopt? The danger of giving them equal rights is that they will begin to assert their right to adopt what they cannot produce in nature. 2. Marriage. Call it "gay marriage" if you want, but don't call it marriage. You don't call a peach a nectarine, but if you start to call peaches nectarines, it diminishes the idea of what you call a nectarine, and dilutes the meaning.
So in principle, with these two exceptions, I think they should have all the rights any other people have, on an indivisual level. On a mass scale, there are dangers.
2006-08-31 23:21:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
To reverse "gay rights" would be to deny a group of freedoms and protection that everyone is entitled to. Besides, unless you're gay,,,gay rights issues are not of concern to you and you should not get involved in things that really don't affect you. Perhaps you're a little "fuzzy" about your sexuality???
2006-08-31 23:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
wow so much ignorance and fear what are you all so afraid of ???
Why they hate so much.
There is a study that says 80% of the people who attack gays and lesbians have had homosexual feelings themselves.
A component considered to play into homophobia, as considered by some theorists, such as Calvin Thomas and Judith Butler, is an individual's fear of being identified as homosexual him or herself.
This notion suggests that when expressing homophobic viewpoints and emotions, the individual who does so is not only expressing his thoughts as to homosexuals, but also actively attempting to distance himself from this category and attributed social status. Therefore, by distancing him or herself from the people in question, he/she is reaffirming his/her role as a heterosexual, within heteronormativity, and contributing to the avoidance of his/her potential labeling and consequent treatment as a homosexual.
This interpretation plays into notions of violent opposition to "the Other" as a means of establishing one's identity as part of the majority and therefore, validated by society. This concept is also recurrent in interpretations of racism and xenophobia
Source(s):
www.en.wikipedia/homophobia
http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/articles...
2006-09-01 00:14:09 · answer #4 · answered by Bearable 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's what you get when you have activist judges and a liberal media. Judges have way too much power with no real checks on them. I was in court once and the judge wouldn't even look at my evidence because she was too lazy. She said she didn't want to be bothered with it and she made a ruling based on what she FELT was right.
Homosexuality is a life style CHOICE and if they CHOOSE to be gay then they must deal with how society "feels" about it. They are not born gay so they shouldn't have any more rights than anyone else. I chose to be a christian and people constantly discriminate against Christian yet we don't ask for special treatment.
When marriage mans anything it means nothing. Look at Canada and England. You have gay marriage now people want to extend it. In Canada they sued to allow multiple wives, in England a woman wants to marry her daughter. Where does it end?
2006-08-31 23:16:29 · answer #5 · answered by N3WJL 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Gay Rights it's all Spin
Gay Rights sounds good but what they really want is MONEY. MONEY.MONEY
They want to sue when they get fired for being gay, they want to get their partners health insurance. They want to be able to claim against estates of deceased partners. They want their partners social security ( when they die)
They want government jobs. They want to be able to sue for Alimony. They are angry because they are being treated differently and want to be able to sue.
It's all about the money, don't fall for it...We'll all be paying for it....
I do not fear Homosexuals but I have noticed that most are pedophiles (like young boys) in a lot of cases
they were "exposed" to homosexuality at a young age.
I have kids and shouldn't have to worry exposing them with Uncle Mike, because it might violate his rights.
I am NOT Homophobic (another spin) I am disgusted...
De-sensitize someone else...
2006-09-01 00:24:58 · answer #6 · answered by Red 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, and I couldn't care less. The only people who are threatened by another persons sexual orientation (between two consenting adults) are those insecure in their own sexuality, and religious zealots who think they have to impose their beliefs on others.
2006-08-31 23:13:58 · answer #7 · answered by Christopher B 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You can even come up with a new argument, you just keep posting the same old crap.
2006-09-01 07:22:10 · answer #8 · answered by Naples_6 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Up until a few years ago, "Gay" meant "happy or content." Why they substituted that for Homosexual is a mystery to me. That can't be a happy and content lifestyle. It's an abomination to God and to me. I don't hate homosexuals, what they are doing is between them and God. I just don't wish to be around them.
2006-08-31 23:13:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
when you get liberal judges legislating from the bench we the people need to pass some laws making it unconstitutional to do it there job is to judge not legislate
And lets be proper on this
DICTIONARY:
GAY-happy carefree without worry
QUEER odd unusual different
It is queer not gay stop the spin
2006-08-31 23:10:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋