Who's to blame?
2006-08-31 22:40:03 · 29 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The question should be...does anyone care?
What annoyed me about the whole thing is that Mother Theresa died the same week and her passing was completely overshadowed by this spoilt little rich girl. It was a sad way to go, but I really couldn't give two monkeys.
As for "Candle in the Wind", don't even get me started. Oy Elton John...NOOOOOO!
2006-08-31 22:45:11 · answer #1 · answered by gromitski 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Secret services intervention and the botch job that is typical of French criminal investigations - the Pink Panther was right in some many ways.
Jokes aside, it is a disgrace. The more time goes on the more evidence is coming out showing the cover -ups that can only lead to the thought that she was murdered - which I certainly never thought at the time.
Fact:
1) The chauffeur was in the pay of secret services
2) The mysterious white Fiat Uno was eventually traced to a member of the paparazzo who was a paid member of secret services - he was found a couple of years later dead in mysterious circumstances
3) A highly respected Professor from Glasgow Uni went to Paris within 24 hours of the "accident" on behalf of Fayed and stated that methods used in the autopsy were not correct
4) The supposed blood test and gas test on the body of the driver shows he had so much alcohol and carbon monoxide in his bloodstream he could not have walked, let alone drive (strangely that same night a suicide via carbon monoxide poisoning came through same coroners office).
5) Many respectable people talked about a white light and a bang before the car crash - yet were dismissed (one of these original witnesses was initially arrested and threatened)
6) Despite the death of one of the most famous people (if not the most famous person) at that time the French removed the car and cleaned the area of all evidence within hours (and mystriously did not have the usual video film of the tunnel's passing vehicles).
The list mate goes on....
2006-09-01 23:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have got here across maximum British human beings to be very well mannered and really exciting. i'm an American, the son of a Scotsman, and if there became ever a human beings to dislike the Brits, it really is going to both be a Scot or an Irishman. growing up, I spent a minimum of faster or later a week taking section in football with foreigners, because it became not a properly commonly used interest back then. the variations in our cultures clarify a lot of ways we % them as such, yet once you get to understand the persons, you'll locate they're extremely a exciting loving bunch and make as a lot exciting of themselves because the do others. it really is very nearly a British comical cultural element. They make exciting of each others' fashionable communities, a lot as we do, yet their type of humor comes for the time of a touch "off" through our criteria. So, purely attempt to understand our cultural variations are what makes us see them because the "severe and powerful, self-righteous assholes", (that and the actual undeniable truth that we beat them for our independence and many are nevertheless bitter about that.)
2016-12-06 02:22:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amazing...your right! Accident, conspriacy, I guess we will never know......unless one day, one of the Operatives involved in this assassination decides it is time to crawl out of the closet and tell the truth.
One must consider the following:
1. She wasn't liked by the royal family.
2. She made Prince Charles look like a retard.
3. And she was having an affair with a Muslim.
Do you think that the Anglo Dynasty of Great Britian would ever allow Muslim blood in it?
I'm waiting to read a book "The Tunnel" by Anonymous
2006-08-31 22:59:23 · answer #4 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because the British public think there is a cover up about it, talk of if she was carrying Fiads( excuse spelling) baby or not, I don't think she will R.I.P until every angle has been covered. There was a TV programme recently trying to blame lots of people. Does seem to be a cover up. As for GROMITSKI's reply, YES alot of people do care
2006-08-31 22:49:16 · answer #5 · answered by tildypops 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i think thats a good question not only because i would like to know who if anyone was to blame but because it is the british tax payer who it paying for this investigation but has it really been nine years, god that is a long time.... oh sorry bck to the question yes i do know why this has taken so long but if i tell you i will have to kill you....so i better keep silent for all our sakes....(it sounded better in my head so please forgive my drama out burst)
2006-09-03 11:12:32 · answer #6 · answered by thenickistar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cover up is the reason why the inquest is not over.
2006-08-31 22:47:40 · answer #7 · answered by Sherzade 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
we dont know thats why the inquest is still going on godamit
2006-09-04 16:30:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you not know that when you have lot and lots of money you can do what ever it is that you want in america and Europe therefore they will continue to write books talk about what they think happen, and with all the forensic science and great investigator in the world may be you think some one would be paying for her death rightfully, just like JonBenet, the legal system love to make murders and child mulestor walk free. think about it.
2006-08-31 22:48:44 · answer #9 · answered by black rose 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the British public like a conspiracy and will not let it go until somebody is to blame. IT WAS AN ACCIDENT!!!
2006-08-31 22:43:18 · answer #10 · answered by johnny28 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋