English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this a joke? There are plenty of white kids that need to be adopted too. Does Jolie think she's like a God or something taking kids of other races and harboring them like the White savior? Or does she want to show that she's so 'accepting' of other races. A much better idea will be to bang Tyson Beckford that dude is half Black and half Asian, it saves a lot more time,

2006-08-31 22:03:04 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

21 answers

Actually, what she is doing is taking kids from third world countries to highlight the plight of the people there. It's a subtle way to intro her humanitarian efforts, not really, but she wants to use her media powers for good not evil, and this is the way she figured out how to do it. I'd rather her do this than just support PETA like alot of other actresses do, never researching where their money goes, or never going to demonstrate for the causes they support.

2006-08-31 22:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by jadeaaustin 4 · 4 1

What kind of question is that? The crack about Tyson, is he your dream? I know a lot of people throughout the years who have adopted children from other countries. It is usually quicker to get through the 'red' tape but thousands of dollars are still spent. I think it is outstanding that Jolie has these children. First, she shows no prejudice, which is an intense problem in the U.S. & Second, these kids are extremely lucky to have her & Brad as parents and I only pray that all children can experience this love.

2006-08-31 22:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by ambay 3 · 0 0

For many years before she'd started adopting, she said that one of her dreams was to assemble a large family from around the world instead of having children. I recall one interview in which she declared that she never intended to have a child herself (which is why I think much of her decision to have a baby was via pressure from Pitt).

The answerer above is correct: it is exceedingly difficult to adopt a healthy (I'm talking phychically and psychologically) white child. Why go through years upon years of struggle and loss (which there very often is, because of bureacracy crap), trying to adopt what you call a 'white kid', when you can help a child from another country who really needs a safe and loving home (because the other option is living in an orphanage (not a safe foster home), among disease and famine, with a higher liklihood to die before hitting ten years old)?

2006-08-31 22:23:50 · answer #3 · answered by ChiChi 6 · 0 0

OMG! You people are the most ignorant ***** on the entire planet. If Jolie only adopted white kids then you'd all be bitching that she is thinks she is too good for other races.

And why the hell wouldn't someone consider adoption even if they can have their own kids? Idiot! It is called compassion. Children need homes. I have two of my own and we were trying very hard to adopt because we wanted to open our home to a child who needed one.

I can't even continue responding to this right now. The level of stupidity at this site is unbelievable.

2006-08-31 22:13:58 · answer #4 · answered by Amelia 5 · 5 1

i purely hate the actual undeniable truth that such issues as those generate a lot publicity. i advise in the journey that they extremely extremely are authentic and favor to really undertake a baby no matter if he's black/asian, fantastic, this is their organization. yet even as it turns into headline information, it turns into completely ridiculous to me. as an get mutually angelina jolie. human beings imagine she's mom teresa because of her generosity in adopting. even with the undeniable fact that the way the youngsters (any movie star toddlers) powerful factors a lot interest for purely the sake that their mothers and fathers are well-known irks me to lack of existence. ok fantastic not their fault even with the undeniable fact that it disgusts me that of their infancy they're frequently 'bought' to magazines for a minimum of $ a million million. even with if the money is going to charity and such it really is senseless interest in the direction of the newborn. who cuts and saves those %. in a scrapbook in any case? they way that they are portrayed as saints purely because they undertake is stupid because there are tonnes of different human beings accessible that undertake for further constructive motives than them. shame on them. sorry if this offends every person. this is purely my 2 cents.

2016-12-06 02:20:21 · answer #5 · answered by pafel 3 · 0 0

actually it's much harder to adopt a healthy white child, you wouldn't believe how many people think like you. White children are not the only ones who need a good home.

2006-08-31 22:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Wow, someone has some racial issues. I think she saw herself as saving those kids who were really in need of her help. It didn't matter what race they were. That's maternal instinct for ya. I feel sorry for yo if the only thing you can see is the outside appearances.

2006-08-31 22:11:10 · answer #7 · answered by ladeda 2 · 3 0

she probably feels like she wants some kids that when shown where the came from will be truly grateful they were adopted bye her not just because she is a very wealthy woman!

2006-08-31 22:09:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You can't be a high profile actor and not show how caring you are by adopting one of every non-white color. I think its a law.

2006-08-31 22:09:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Are you retarded? Do you think about your ignorant questions before posting them on here? Are YOU trying to be funny? or just showing off your stupidity? let me know, you fricken idiot.

2006-09-01 02:48:33 · answer #10 · answered by Melia 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers