Britain should give back Kohinoor Diaminond of India ? Who is the owner India or Pakistan? why?

Answer 1

Well! it would be a very decent gesture if Britain has enough heart to return the Kohinoor Diamond to India.
Though it's not much likely because now it is a part of the British queen's crown. Moreover there are uncounted precious things that the British looted from India, and I don't think there is any way by which they can ever return any part of it. I don't expect anything either.
As for the ownership of the Kohinoor...the time when the diamond was taken by the British...there was one India...and if we decide for the ownership...It would be India, Geographically though part of Ranjit Singh's kingdom lies both in India and Pakistan.
If we go back to that time...India will also be in a position to claim the whole of Pakistan!!!

Answer 2

It was Queen Victoria that took over India in her Reign.Great Britain owned it and was part of her Empire.

Send a letter to HM the Queen Elizabeth 2nd. I don't think you will get very far as I believe it is in her Crown that she wore on Coronation Day, and is Housed at the Tower of London.

Diaminond is spelt DIAMOND by the way,why don't you use your Spell Check above where you write your Question or Answers.
Just Tick the little box with the Tick in it,that goes for everybody who can't Spell.

Answer 3

Yes they should give it back to us
The owner obviously India b'coz (Baap to baap hi hai)and till the father dies the property belongs to the father than it is either passed on to the son or to the charity and it also the matter of self respect of the Indians to get back the Kohinoor from the Angrez .

Answer 4

Technically speaking, the diamond is owned by the British government. It was acquired 'legally' (although not necessarily morally) after the final defeat of the Sikhs in 1848, and was passed to Britain as part of what was effectively a reparation payment for the war. It was not "looted" from India, and therefore there is not real argument for its return.

Answer 5

No I don't believe they should.

My reasoning is that once you start doing this where do you stop? It is a diamond, an item of monetary but little artistic value, the diamond itself has been heavily recut since it was Indian and in no way resembles its original state.

Were it a work of art or historically valuable, like for instance the Elgin Marbles my opinion would differ as it would then have a relevant cultural value however it is not.

In its life it has been owned by various Indian/Pakistani rulers and Afghani /Perisan ones as well - who has the most right to it ?

This and your other questions seem to be deliberate and designed to start arguments rather than gain answers to questions.

If you wish to debate goto Yahoo Discuss, here is the link:

http://uk.messages.news.yahoo.com/

Yahoo Answers if for people who need answers to questions not people who wish to debate their politics.

Answer 6

Ambition of Jinnah to be PM became thwarted through Gandhi, who fashionable Nehru to steer the country. British rulers fanned the mistrust of muslims about a available Hindu domination exploiting the displeasure of Jinnah over Nehru's candidature for the PM submit (there have been sufficient Hindu leaders who also dreamed of Hindu Rashtra, even with the undeniable fact that public help became for secular progression, which could ensure cohesion and propagated through Gandhians, whom they relied on). contained in the complicated political concern, the British had strategic motives to maintain India divided and weakened really than pose any project to its own (British) supremacy as a political commonly used contained in the international! Any united states of america that were contained in the vanguard of global politics would genuinely favor to slash someone less than their rule formerly, to overhaul them! And India became huge and with plentiful elements, wherefore its monetary equipment will be hastily restored to its unique prosperity, for which there have been good leaders too! even with the undeniable fact that the religious conflicts that ensued on the eve of partition a lot damaged the sleek commence of the country as a loose India poised for a take off! there have been too many aspects, with the exception of the British plots, like Jinnah's ambition, the Hindu and Muslim leaders' incorrect doubts and distrusts about the rulers etc. It became a dismal, painful era, whose victims are nevertheless suffering contained in the border districts of both international locations! So enable us not rake up a sad heritage and make latest era of the Britains, Pakis and Indians sense undesirable. we've good kin with uk or perhaps China that invaded and annexed a significant portion of our northern borders! in ordinary words Pak is exhibiting double face with the Kashmir card, to harass the Indians!

Answer 7

india is the original owner of the kohinoor diamond of course when the british people took over india they took charge of everything misusing india's wealth for their own benifits. they did do good stuff too but the corruption over weighed their good deeds

Answer 8

The owner is the person who has it. You cant give back 1 or 2 things so where do you stop? Shall we give back all the furniture that our ancesters nicked? What about all the coins that we keep on finding? Who do they belong to? Where does it stop?

Answer 9

Why do you feel the need to know what others think of such an obscure subject.? A diamond is only a lump of carbon .
Besides what can any body do with it besides hanging it round there neck?.

Answer 10

Brits should give back everything they have stolen from other countries including the marbles from Parthenon(not Elgin marbles)