English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What's your take on it?

2006-08-31 20:46:39 · 5 answers · asked by royal_crown78 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

5 answers

create our own perception and compromised it

2006-08-31 20:52:05 · answer #1 · answered by Henry W 7 · 0 0

is a straw man argument used by the religious to make non-religious seem immoral. In reality, if moral relativity really exists, thenit is religions like Christianity which are morally relative since they judge actions different depending on a whether someone repents or not.

A non-religious person on the other hand, will only look at the action itself and compare it with his own moral code, as well as any extenuating circumstances at the time of the action being judged. What happens afterwards has no bearing on morality of the incident to the non-religious, only the religious.

2006-08-31 20:57:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Meh - I suppose they are, but objective reality interactions mean that I can shape the morals of others.

2006-08-31 20:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

bob dylan stole his neighbors records which included his biggest influence, woody guthrie (i think because they were rare and he didn't have the money himself). this allowed him to progress as a musician. it is considered wrong and immoral to steal, but had bob not stolen these records, would he have been the influence on our culture today?

2006-08-31 20:54:20 · answer #4 · answered by curious1 3 · 0 0

it's good. heh.

2006-08-31 20:50:12 · answer #5 · answered by altgrave 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers