NOrth korea is a bigger threat arent they .. they took thier nuke program under ground to stay secret and they have been developing they're long distance missles.. ..they have china and russia on they're side im sure .. and we focus our attention on iran???
2006-08-31 19:14:34 · 11 answers · asked by dustin s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Exactly.
2006-08-31 19:17:02 · answer #1 · answered by Ebee 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iran is a more hostile nation, the are fast acters, quick to shoot first ask questions later. North Korea is more cousious and precise than that. It took N korea 2 yr to fire long range missle after kicking out UN investigators. Iran would have dropped a bomb on someone in that time. Which makes Iran the much higher risk for global stability.
2006-08-31 19:28:47 · answer #2 · answered by Benjamin G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither have nukes as yet. In fact, North Korea's missle tests of July 4th were so bad, all it did was verify to others of how far down the road their program really is. And it is not close at all.
Just like the cummunist Soviets, all talk. Nothing to back it up.
2006-08-31 19:23:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Threat? Why the f*ck do Americans live in constant fear of other nations? 9/11? Crawl out from your little f*cking hidey hole and start living again.The only people i hear making threats are the american government and the terrorists.The difference between the two, i`ve yet to discover. Give everyone a bomb, lets see america f*ck around with a country which has a real way of defending itself. It`s all bull$hit. If America kept it`s dirty little fat fingers from trying to steal the worlds energy resousces we would all be fine. No war.
2006-08-31 20:35:59 · answer #4 · answered by dingdong 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's a good question. I think BushCo see the Middle East as some sort of fertile ground for 'democracy' (read: lots of crap shopping malls, and a stranglehold on the oil supply), whereas in Asia, only North Korea seems to be troublesome. China violates human rights but because it is potentially as powerful as many western states it is left alone.
I'm no fan of the Iranian leader, but if you are backed into a corner, you're going to try to defend yourself, and BushCo don't like that. Israel, meanwhile, can do whatever it pleases--thanks to support from BushCo.
2006-08-31 19:35:59 · answer #5 · answered by tiko 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
North Korea is a pimple on communist RED china's azz....... NK is trying to blackmail the world, they got away with it once.... re: clinton.
Iran has become a BOIL on the world's azz.... and has stated its Islamic intentions to kill all Jews and all who do not accept Islam....
commUNist RED china and Russia are not actually on NK's side, they are playing games also.... they would like to see the USA submit to NK's blackmail.
Two things the USA must focus on: ILLEGAL ALIENS and Islamo-fascism.
Either one or both have the ability to effect the future of the USA. If either does so, it will not be the future you want for your children....
2006-08-31 19:44:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iran is more likely to actually use them. The Religous Clerics that control Iran will die and take their Hevenly reward. NK is crazy but not suicidal. Plus Japan is about to take out NK for us. They are actually talking about changing their constitution to allow them to make the first strike. Something their Government has disavowed since WWII
2006-08-31 20:27:35 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
specific we are able to conquer the two or the two. Our armed forces ability is dramatically bigger than the two. in spite of the shown fact that, in the two situations they have extreme fortifications (underground bunkers) which could stand up to our maximum suitable penetrating bombs, so there might could desire to be some floor interest suitable up of their face. North Korea is greater problematical based on the artillery strike that they had lay in on the South, and that could desire to could desire to be a great marketing campaign with coalition help. Iran we are able to greater surely do on our own. it would desire to be rapid & grimy as we don't desire to be tied down in an insurgency like we are in Iraq. in case you could take out maximum of their armed forces ability, wreck all nuke application, & decrease off the pinnacle (Pres & exceedingly the Gurardian Council), then only difficult seal the Iraqi borders & placed an ACR on the border with Iran. Yeah shall we do it. the project "if we don't" is approximately as undesirable using fact the "if we do." and different motivators in US interest (stability of skill in mid-east) so i could desire to work out it happening.
2016-10-01 04:06:59 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a million dollar ??? The best advise I can personally give you, is contact your Governor, or State Rep and ask them. If more people would do just that; they would know what people want from the Government. They would have to listen to "The People" and not just "Their People"... Hope it helps...
2006-08-31 19:20:44 · answer #9 · answered by tinytinker79 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cuz Bush is concerned more about the security of Israel than his own country's.
2006-08-31 19:22:56 · answer #10 · answered by Ms_4peace 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋